Robust optimization for HDR prostate brachytherapy applied to organ reconstruction uncertainty

被引:7
作者
van der Meer, Marjolein C. [1 ]
Bosman, Peter A. N. [2 ]
Niatsetski, Yury [3 ]
Alderliesten, Tanja [4 ]
Pieters, Bradley R. [1 ]
Bel, Arjan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Locat Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Ctr Wiskunde & Informat, Life Sci & Hlth Res Grp, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Elekta, Phys & Adv Dev, Veenendaal, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Leiden, Netherlands
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
robust optimization; HDR brachytherapy; prostate neoplasms; treatment planning; dose-volume indices; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/abe04e
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Purpose. Recently, we introduced a bi-objective optimization approach based on dose-volume indices to automatically create clinically good HDR prostate brachytherapy plans. To calculate dose-volume indices, a reconstruction algorithm is used to determine the 3D organ shape from 2D contours, inevitably containing settings that influence the result. We augment the optimization approach to quickly find plans that are robust to differences in 3D reconstruction. Methods. Studied reconstruction settings were: interpolation between delineated organ contours, overlap between contours, and organ shape at the top and bottom contour. Two options for each setting yields 8 possible 3D organ reconstructions per patient, over which the robust model defines minimax optimization. For the original model, settings were based on our treatment planning system. Both models were tested on data of 26 patients and compared by re-evaluating selected optimized plans both in the original model (1 organ reconstruction, the difference determines the cost), and in the robust model (8 organ reconstructions, the difference determines the benefit). Results. Robust optimization increased the run time from 3 to 6 min. The median cost for robust optimization as observed in the original model was -0.25% in the dose-volume indices with a range of [-0.01%, -1.03%]. The median benefit of robust optimization as observed in the robust model was 0.93% with a range of [0.19%, 4.16%]. For 4 patients, selected plans that appeared good when optimized in the original model, violated the clinical protocol with more than 1% when considering different settings. This was not the case for robustly optimized plans. Conclusions. Plans of high quality, irrespective of 3D organ reconstruction settings, can be obtained using our robust optimization approach. With its limited effect on total runtime, our approach therefore offers a way to account for dosimetry uncertainties that result from choices in organ reconstruction settings that is viable in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Robust Optimization of Dose-Volume Metrics for Prostate HDR-Brachytherapy Incorporating Target and OAR Volume Delineation Uncertainties [J].
Balvert, Marleen ;
den Hertog, Dick ;
Hoffmann, Aswin L. .
INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2019, 31 (01) :100-114
[2]   Report of the Task Group 186 on model-based dose calculation methods in brachytherapy beyond the TG-43 formalism: Current status and recommendations for clinical implementation [J].
Beaulieu, Luc ;
Tedgren, Asa Carlsson ;
Carrier, Jean-Francois ;
Davis, Stephen D. ;
Mourtada, Firas ;
Rivard, Mark J. ;
Thomson, Rowan M. ;
Verhaegen, Frank ;
Wareing, Todd A. ;
Williamson, Jeffrey F. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (10) :6208-6236
[3]   GPU-accelerated bi-objective treatment planning for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy [J].
Bouter, Anton ;
Alderliesten, Tanja ;
Pieters, Bradley R. ;
Bel, Arjan ;
Niatsetski, Yury ;
Bosman, Peter A. N. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (09) :3776-3787
[4]   High-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy inverse planning on dose-volume criteria by simulated annealing [J].
Deist, T. M. ;
Gorissen, B. L. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (03) :1155-1170
[5]   A critical evaluation of worst case optimization methods for robust intensity-modulated proton therapy planning [J].
Fredriksson, Albin ;
Bokrantz, Rasmus .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (08) :48-58
[6]  
Karabis A., 2009, World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7-12, 2009, Munich, Germany, P612, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-03474-9_172
[7]   Accuracy of volume and DVH parameters determined with different brachytherapy treatment planning systems [J].
Kirisits, Christian ;
Siebert, Frank-Andre ;
Baltas, Dimos ;
De Brabandere, Marisol ;
Hellebust, Taran Paulsen ;
Berger, Daniel ;
Venselaar, Jack .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 (03) :290-297
[8]   Inverse planning anatomy-based dose optimization for HDR-brachytherapy of the prostate using fast simulated annealing algorithm and dedicated objective function [J].
Lessard, E ;
Pouliot, J .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (05) :773-779
[9]   Automatic bi-objective parameter tuning for inverse planning of high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy [J].
Maree, S. C. ;
Bosman, P. A. N. ;
van Wieringen, N. ;
Niatsetski, Y. ;
Pieters, B. R. ;
Bel, A. ;
Alderliesten, T. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (07)
[10]   Evaluation of bi-objective treatment planning for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy-A retrospective observer study [J].
Maree, Stefanus C. ;
Luong, Ngoc Hoang ;
Kooreman, Ernst S. ;
van Wieringen, Niek ;
Bel, Arjan ;
Hinnen, Karel A. ;
Westerveld, Henrike ;
Pieters, Bradley R. ;
Bosman, Peter A. N. ;
Alderliesten, Tanja .
BRACHYTHERAPY, 2019, 18 (03) :396-403