Outcome after treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis - Results from a systematic review using meta-analysis techniques

被引:78
作者
Radke, PW
Kaiser, A
Frost, C
Sigwart, U
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, RWTH, Dept Cardiol, D-52057 Aachen, Germany
[2] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Med Stat Unit, London WC1, England
[3] Univ Hosp, RWTH, Dept Cardiol, Aachen, Germany
关键词
stent; restenosis; treatment; outcome; review; meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S0195-668X(02)00202-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims To evaluate the clinical outcome after treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis. Methods and results For identification of the relevant literature a specific search strategy was conducted and explicit inclusion criteria were defined to avoid selection bias. Based on the selected literature, a systematic review using descriptive statistics and meta-anatysis methods regarding the outcome after treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis was performed. The proportion of patients experiencing a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) as defined by death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization was the main outcome measure. A total of 1304 citations were identified. Among these, 28 studies (six different treatment modalities) including a total of 3012 patients met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated into this analysis. The estimated average probability of experiencing a major cardiac adverse event after treatment for in-stent restenosis with a follow-up period of 9 4 months was 30.0% (25.0-34.9%, 95% confidence interval) with strong evidence for heterogeneity between study specific results (P = 0.0001). The clinical outcome was not significantly different between treatment modalities. After adjustment for confounding factors (i.e. lesion length), however, patients undergoing intracoronary radiation showed an estimated advantage of 16.9% (-37.7 +/- 4.0%, 95% confidence interval) in MACE free survival, as compared to balloon angioplasty. The post-interventional diameter stenosis was the only independent predictor for the tong-term outcome after treatment of in-stent restenosis. Conclusions Treatment of in-stent restenosis is associated with an overall 30% rate of major adverse cardiac events. Currently, repeat angioplasty is the treatment option of choice, especially when a sufficient acute procedural result can be achieved. Intracoronary radiation should be considered in cases with therapy refractory forms of diffuse in-stent restenosis. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd on behalf of The European Society of Cardiology.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 273
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Al-Sergani HS, 1999, CATHETER CARDIO INTE, V48, P143, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(199910)48:2<143::AID-CCD4>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-D
[3]   Long-term outcome and determinants of event-free survival in patients treated with balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis [J].
Alfonso, F ;
Pérez-Vizcayno, MJ ;
Hernández, R ;
Goicolea, J ;
Fernández-Ortíz, A ;
Escaned, J ;
Bañuelos, C ;
Fernández, C ;
Macaya, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 83 (08) :1268-+
[4]  
Antoniucci D, 2000, CATHETER CARDIO INTE, V49, P376, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(200004)49:4<376::AID-CCD5>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-O
[6]  
Bauters C, 1998, CIRCULATION, V97, P318
[7]   In-stent restenosis: Long-term outcome and predictors of subsequent target lesion revascularization after repeat balloon angioplasty [J].
Bossi, I ;
Klersy, C ;
Black, AJ ;
Cortina, R ;
Choussat, R ;
Cassagneau, B ;
Jordan, C ;
Laborde, JC ;
Laurent, JP ;
Bernies, M ;
Fajadet, J ;
Marco, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 35 (06) :1569-1576
[8]   INTRACORONARY STENTING WITHOUT ANTICOAGULATION ACCOMPLISHED WITH INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE [J].
COLOMBO, A ;
HALL, P ;
NAKAMURA, S ;
ALMAGOR, Y ;
MAIELLO, L ;
MARTINI, G ;
GAGLIONE, A ;
GOLDBERG, SL ;
TOBIS, JM .
CIRCULATION, 1995, 91 (06) :1676-1688
[9]   Pulmonary artery catheters in the critically ill - An overview using the methodology of evidence-based medicine [J].
Cooper, AB ;
Doig, GS ;
Sibbald, WJ .
CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 1996, 12 (04) :777-+
[10]  
DAHL J, 1999, AM J CARDIOL, V83, P862