Prognostic factors for patients with anal cancer treated with conformal radiotherapy-a systematic review

被引:12
|
作者
Theophanous, Stelios [1 ]
Samuel, Robert [1 ]
Lilley, John [2 ]
Henry, Ann [1 ]
Sebag-Montefiore, David [1 ]
Gilbert, Alexandra [1 ]
Appelt, Ane L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Med Res, Beckett St, Leeds LS9 7TE, W Yorkshire, England
[2] St James Univ Hosp, Leeds Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Leeds LS9 7TF, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Systematic review; Anal cancer; Squamous cell carcinoma; Conformal radiotherapy; IMRT; VMAT; Cancer outcomes; Survival outcomes; Prognostic factors; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; HIV-POSITIVE PATIENTS; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ACT II; CHEMORADIATION; OUTCOMES; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; RECURRENCE; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-022-09729-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aims Anal cancer is primarily treated using concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT), with conformal techniques such as intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) now being the standard techniques utilised across the world. Despite this, there is still very limited consensus on prognostic factors for outcome following conformal CRT. This systematic review aims to evaluate the existing literature to identify prognostic factors for a variety of oncological outcomes in anal cancer, focusing on patients treated with curative intent using contemporary conformal radiotherapy techniques. Materials and methods A literature search was conducted using Medline and Embase to identify studies reporting on prognostic factors for survival and cancer-related outcomes after conformal CRT for anal cancer. The prognostic factors which were identified as significant in univariable and multivariable analysis, along with their respective factor effects (where available) were extracted. Only factors reported as prognostic in more than one study were included in the final results. Results The results from 19 studies were analysed. In both univariable and multivariable analysis, N stage, T stage, and sex were found to be the most prevalent and reliable clinical prognostic factors for the majority of outcomes explored. Only a few biomarkers have been identified as prognostic by more than one study - pre-treatment biopsy HPV load, as well as the presence of leukocytosis, neutrophilia and anaemia at baseline measurement. The results also highlight the lack of studies with large cohorts exploring the prognostic significance of imaging factors. Conclusion Establishing a set of prognostic and potentially predictive factors for anal cancer outcomes can guide the risk stratification of patients, aiding the design of future clinical trials. Such trials will in turn provide us with greater insight into how to effectively treat this disease using a more personalised approach.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Relapse patterns and related prognostic factors in patients with mobile tongue cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy
    Kamer, S.
    Esassolak, M.
    Demirci, S.
    Akyildiz, S.
    Sengul, A.
    Yavuzer, A.
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2009, 14 (01): : 51 - 56
  • [22] Chemotherapy/chemoradiation in anal cancer: A systematic review
    Lim, Faye
    Glynne-Jones, Rob
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2011, 37 (07) : 520 - 532
  • [23] Late gastrointestinal toxicity after radiotherapy for anal cancer: a systematic literature review
    Bin Pan, Yi
    Maeda, Yasuko
    Wilson, Ana
    Glynne-Jones, Rob
    Vaizey, Carolynne J.
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2018, 57 (11) : 1427 - 1437
  • [24] A Systematic Review of Transoral Robotic Surgery and Radiotherapy for Early Oropharynx Cancer: A Systematic Review
    de Almeida, John R.
    Byrd, James K.
    Wu, Rebecca
    Stucken, Chaz L.
    Duvvuri, Uma
    Goldstein, David P.
    Miles, Brett A.
    Teng, Marita S.
    Gupta, Vishal
    Genden, Eric M.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2014, 124 (09) : 2096 - 2102
  • [25] Prognostic factors in patients with T1 glottic cancer treated with radiotherapy
    Mucha-Malecka, A.
    Chrostowska, A.
    Urbanek, K.
    Malecki, K.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2019, 195 (09) : 792 - 804
  • [26] Diagnostic and prognostic factors in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review
    Beyer, Katharina
    Moris, Lisa
    Lardas, Michael
    Haire, Anna
    Barletta, Francesco
    Scuderi, Simone
    Molnar, Megan
    Herrera, Ronald
    Rauf, Abdul
    Campi, Riccardo
    Greco, Isabella
    Shiranov, Kirill
    Dabestani, Saeed
    van den Broeck, Thomas
    Arun, Sujenthiran
    Gacci, Mauro
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Omar, Muhammad Imran
    MacLennan, Steven
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Farahmand, Bahman
    Vradi, Eleni
    Devecseri, Zsuzsanna
    Asiimwe, Alex
    Zong, Jihong
    Maclennan, Sara J.
    Collette, Laurence
    NDow, James
    Briganti, Alberto
    Bjartell, Anders
    Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [27] A systematic review of circulating predictive and prognostic biomarkers to aid the personalised use of radiotherapy in the radical treatment of patients with oesophageal cancer
    McClurg, Dylan P.
    Sanghera, Chandan
    Mukherjee, Somnath
    Fitzgerald, Rebecca C.
    Jones, Christopher M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 195
  • [28] The prognostic significance of sarcopenia in patients treated with definitive radiotherapy: A systematic review
    Vickers, Alexander J.
    McSweeney, Donal M.
    Choudhury, Ananya
    Weaver, Jamie
    Price, Gareth
    McWilliam, Alan
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2025, 203
  • [29] Analysis of prognostic factors in 1180 patients with oral cavity primary cancer treated with definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy
    Murthy, V.
    Agarwal, J. P.
    Laskar, S. Ghosh
    Gupta, T.
    Budrukkar, A.
    Pai, P.
    Chaturvedi, P.
    Chaukar, D.
    D'Cruz, A.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 6 (03) : 282 - 289
  • [30] Comparison of toxicity after IMRT and 3D-conformal radiotherapy for patients with pancreatic cancer - A systematic review
    Bittner, Martin-Immanuel
    Grosu, Anca-Ligia
    Brunner, Thomas B.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 114 (01) : 117 - 121