Mechanistic Approach to Understanding the Influence of USP Apparatus I and II on Dissolution Kinetics of Tablets with Different Operating Release Mechanisms

被引:6
作者
Lu, Zheng [1 ]
Fassihi, Reza [1 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Sch Pharm, 3307 N Broad St, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
关键词
controlled release matrix tablet; hydrodynamics; immediate release tablet; release kinetic models; USP apparatus I and II; DRUG-RELEASE; AGITATION; PROFILES; MATRICES; RELAXATION; EXCIPIENTS; DIFFUSION; RATES;
D O I
10.1208/s12249-016-0535-x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
This article provides an analysis of dissolution kinetics associated with formulations subjected to different dissolution methods with the purpose of revealing credible direction on selection of apparatus type and hydrodynamics on in vitro drug release profiles using three different formulations. The dissolution kinetics of immediate release (IR) and controlled release (CR) ibuprofen tablets under different hydrodynamic conditions were determined, and potential existence of any correlation between USP apparatus I and II were analyzed using adequate kinetic models. Two types of CR tablets based on PEO (polyethylene oxide-N80) and HPMC (hydroxypropyl methylcellulose- K100M) polymers were prepared. Marketed ibuprofen 200-mg IR tablets were also used. Dissolution studies were carried out using USP 34 apparatuses I and II methods at stirring speed of 100 and 50 rpm in 900 mL phosphate buffer, pH 7.2 at 37 degrees C. The drug release profiles for each formulation was determined and statistically analyzed using model-dependent, model-independent (f2), and ANOVA methods. No significant dissolution differences existed between IR tablets, whereas CR tablets were significantly impacted by apparatus types and hydrodynamics. PEO matrices displayed higher sensitivity to hydrodynamics relative to HPMC matrices, and differences in dissolution profiles were confirmed by ANOVA and boxplot analysis. It is concluded that in the case of CR systems, selection of apparatus type and adherence to the monograph specifications and hydrodynamic conditions is critical, while for IR tablets, both apparatus types and agitation rates had no significant impact on drug release rate, suggesting the possibility of apparatus interchangeability if desired.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 472
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, GUID IND WAIV VIV BI
[2]  
Baker R.W., 1974, Controlled Release of Biologically active Agents, P15
[3]   DIFFUSION AND RELAXATION IN GLASSY POLYMER POWDERS .2. SEPARATION OF DIFFUSION AND RELAXATION PARAMETERS [J].
BERENS, AR ;
HOPFENBERG, HB .
POLYMER, 1978, 19 (05) :489-496
[4]  
Brunner E, 1904, Z PHYS CHEM-STOCH VE, V47, P56
[5]  
Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP), 2000, NOT GUID INV BIOAV B
[6]   Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles [J].
Costa, P ;
Manuel, J ;
Lobo, S .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2001, 13 (02) :123-133
[7]   Influence of dissolution medium agitation on release profiles of sustained-release tablets [J].
Costa, P ;
Lobo, JMS .
DRUG DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL PHARMACY, 2001, 27 (08) :811-817
[8]   Guar-based monolithic matrix systems:: effect of ionizable and non-ionizable substances and excipients on gel dynamics and release kinetics [J].
Dürig, T ;
Fassihi, R .
JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE, 2002, 80 (1-3) :45-56
[9]   METHODS OF EXPRESSING DISSOLUTION RATE DATA [J].
GOLDSMITH, JA ;
RANDALL, N ;
ROSS, SD .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1978, 30 (06) :347-349
[10]   Polymer Percolation Threshold in HPMC Extended Release Formulation of Carbamazepine and Verapamil HCl [J].
Goncalves-Araujo, Tamara ;
Rajabi-Siahboomi, Ali R. ;
Caraballo, Isidoro .
AAPS PHARMSCITECH, 2010, 11 (02) :558-562