A Global Study Into the Reasons for Lean Six Sigma Project Failures: Key Findings and Directions for Further Research

被引:32
作者
Antony, Jiju [1 ]
Lizarelli, Fabiane Leticia [2 ]
Fernandes, Marcelo Machado [3 ]
机构
[1] Heriot Watt Univ, Dept Business Management, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Dept Prod Engn, BR-13565905 Sao Carlos, Brazil
[3] MF Operat Excellence, BR-37500903 Itajuba, Brazil
关键词
Six sigma; Belts; Organizations; Tools; Project management; Training; Sustainable development; Continuous improvement (CI); lean six sigma (LSS); project failures; six sigma (SS); survey; CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS; BARRIERS; IMPLEMENTATION; LEADERSHIP; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2020.3009935
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A low success rate of improvement projects is one of the causes of the discontinuity of lean six sigma (LSS) initiatives in companies. It is essential to identify and evaluate the reasons why LSS improvement projects fail in order to enable LSS, Lean, and six sigma sustainability. This article presents the findings from a global survey conducted with 201 LSS experts around the world in both the service and manufacturing sectors. The results of this article point out the significant failure rates for LSS projects and alert that projects had higher termination rates in the measure and analyze phases [define, measure, analyze, improve, and control (DMAIC)]. Failures occur primarily at the corporate level. The main causes of project failures identified were the lack of commitment by top management, resistance to change, inadequate rewards and recognition mechanisms, inconsistent monitoring and control of the projects, and poor communication. This article shows that there are some minor differences in terms of ranking of these factors between the manufacturing and service sectors, but there is a significant difference in terms of continent and belt level (master black belts, black belts, and green belts).
引用
收藏
页码:2399 / 2414
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Critical success factors of Lean Six Sigma deployment: a current review [J].
Abu Bakar, Fairul Anwar ;
Subari, Khairanum ;
Daril, Mohd Amran Mohd .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2015, 6 (04) :339-348
[2]   Critical failure factors of Lean Six Sigma: a systematic literature review [J].
Albliwi, Saja ;
Antony, Jiju ;
Lim, Sarina ;
van der Wiele, Ton .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2014, 31 (09) :1012-1030
[3]  
Albliwi SA, 2017, INT J QUAL RELIAB MA, V34, P508, DOI 10.1108/IJQRM-09-2015-0138
[4]   Factorial structure for Six Sigma project barriers in Indian manufacturing and service industries [J].
Ambekar, Suhas ;
Hudnurkar, Manoj .
TQM Journal, 2017, 29 (05) :744-759
[5]   Role of explicit and tacit knowledge in Six Sigma projects: An empirical examination of differential project success [J].
Anand, Gopesh ;
Ward, Peter T. ;
Tatikonda, Mohan V. .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2010, 28 (04) :303-315
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2020, WORLD BANK COUNTR LE
[7]  
Antony J., 2016, Lean Six Sigma for Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: A Practical Guide
[8]   A study into the reasons for process improvement project failures: results from a pilot survey [J].
Antony, Jiju ;
Lizarelli, Fabiane Leticia ;
Fernandes, Marcelo Machado ;
Dempsey, Mary ;
Brennan, Attracta ;
McFarlane, Julie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2019, 36 (10) :1699-1720
[9]   Top ten reasons for process improvement project failures [J].
Antony, Jiju ;
Gupta, Sandeep .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2019, 10 (01) :367-374
[10]   Ten commandments of Lean Six Sigma: a practitioners' perspective [J].
Antony, Jiju ;
Gupta, Sandeep ;
Sunder, Vijaya M. ;
Gijo, E. V. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 67 (06) :1033-1044