Salmon welfare index model 2.0: an extended model for overall welfare assessment of caged Atlantic salmon, based on a review of selected welfare indicators and intended for fish health professionals

被引:46
|
作者
Pettersen, Jostein M. [1 ]
Bracke, Marc B. M. [2 ]
Midtlyng, Paul J. [1 ]
Folkedal, Ole [3 ]
Stien, Lars H. [3 ]
Steffenak, Havard [4 ]
Kristiansen, Tore S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Sch Vet Sci, N-0033 Oslo, Norway
[2] Wageningen UR Livestock Res, Lelystad, Netherlands
[3] Inst Marine Res, N-5024 Bergen, Norway
[4] Norwegian Food Safety Author, Brumunddal, Norway
关键词
animal welfare score; aquaculture; diagnostic; fish health; sea cage; welfare indicator; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; TROUT ONCORHYNCHUS-MYKISS; SKELETAL-MUSCLE INFLAMMATION; AFFECT CATARACT DEVELOPMENT; FARMED RAINBOW-TROUT; SALAR L; ANIMAL-WELFARE; SEMANTIC MODEL; INTRAPERITONEAL VACCINATION; CARDIOMYOPATHY SYNDROME;
D O I
10.1111/raq.12039
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Here, we present an extended version of a semantic model for overall welfare assessment of Atlantic salmon reared in sea cages. The model, called SWIM 2.0, is designed to enable fish health professionals to make a formal and standardized assessment of fish welfare using a set of reviewed welfare indicators. SWIM 2.0 supplements SWIM 1.0, which was designed for application by fish farmers. We searched the literature for documented welfare indicators that could be used by fish health professionals. The selected indicators are eyes, cardiac condition, abdominal organs, gills, opercula, skeletal muscles, vaccine-related pathology, aberrant fish, necropsy of the dead fish and active euthanasia. Selection criteria for the SWIM 2.0 indicators were that they should be practical and measureable on salmon farms by fish health professionals and that each indicator could be divided into levels from good to poor welfare backed up by relevant scientific literature. To estimate each indicator's relative impact on welfare, all the indicators were weighted based on their respective literature reviews and according to weighting factors defined as part of the semantic modelling framework. This was ultimately amalgamated into an overall SWIM 2.0 model that can be used to calculate welfare indexes for salmon in sea cages, taking into account the available fish health expertise. Using this model, an example calculation based on recordings and samplings done from an Atlantic salmon sea cage containing 106 000 fish yielded an overall welfare index of 0.81 of a maximum of 1.0.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 179
页数:18
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Salmon Welfare Index Model (SWIM 1.0): a semantic model for overall welfare assessment of caged Atlantic salmon: review of the selected welfare indicators and model presentation
    Stien, Lars H.
    Bracke, Marc B. M.
    Folkedal, Ole
    Nilsson, Jonatan
    Oppedal, Frode
    Torgersen, Thomas
    Kittilsen, Silje
    Midtlyng, Paul J.
    Vindas, Marco A.
    Overli, Oyvind
    Kristiansen, Tore S.
    REVIEWS IN AQUACULTURE, 2013, 5 (01) : 33 - 57
  • [2] On-farm evaluation of the Salmon Welfare Index Model (SWIM 1.0): theoretical and practical considerations
    Folkedal, O.
    Pettersen, J. M.
    Bracke, M. B. M.
    Stien, L. H.
    Nilsson, J.
    Martins, C.
    Breck, O.
    Midtlyng, P. J.
    Kristiansen, T.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2016, 25 (01) : 135 - 149
  • [3] Welfare effects of environmental hypercapnia quantified by indicators based on morphology and allostatic load in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)
    Hoglund, Erik
    Folkedal, Ole
    Aerts, Johan
    Hvas, Malthe
    overli, Oyvind
    Jensen, Anders-Mangor
    Vindas, Marco A.
    Nilsson, Jonatan
    Kristiansen, Tore
    AQUACULTURE, 2023, 572
  • [4] Optimisation of trace mineral supplementation in diets for Atlantic salmon smolt with reference to holistic fish performance in terms of growth, health, welfare, and potential environmental impacts
    Kokkali, Marialena
    Sveen, Lene
    Larsson, Thomas
    Krasnov, Aleksei
    Giakovakis, Alexandros
    Sweetman, John
    Lyons, Philip
    Kousoulaki, Katerina
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [5] Using model selection to choose a size-based condition index that is consistent with operational welfare indicators
    Rey, Sonia
    Treasurer, Jim
    Pattillo, Connie
    McAdam, Bruce J.
    JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 2021, 99 (03) : 782 - 795
  • [6] The good, the bad, the comfortable: a review of welfare practices and indicators based on the five domains model in farmed deer
    Esattore, Bruno
    Bartosova, Hana
    Bartosova, Jitka
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE, 2024,