Incorporating model parameter uncertainty into inverse treatment planning

被引:13
作者
Lian, J [1 ]
Xing, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
inverse planning; dose optimization; biological models; IMRT;
D O I
10.1118/1.1785451
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Radiobiological treatment planning depends not only on the accuracy of the models describing the dose-response relation of different tumors and normal tissues but also on the accuracy of tissue specific radiobiological parameters in these models. Whereas the general formalism remains the same, different sets of model parameters lead to different solutions and thus critically determine the final plan. Here we describe an inverse planning formalism with inclusion of model parameter uncertainties. This is made possible by using a statistical analysis-based frameset developed by our group. In this formalism, the uncertainties of model parameters, such as the parameter a that describes tissue-specific effect in the equivalent uniform dose (EUD) model, are expressed by probability density function and are included in the dose optimization process. We found that the final solution strongly depends on distribution functions of the model parameters. Considering that currently available models for computing biological effects of radiation are simplistic, and the clinical data used to derive the models are sparse and of questionable quality, the proposed technique provides us with an effective tool to minimize the effect caused by the uncertainties in a statistical sense. With the incorporation of the uncertainties, the technique has potential for us to maximally utilize the available radiobiology knowledge for better IMRT treatment. (C) 2004 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:2711 / 2720
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
ABRAMOWITZ M, 1984, HDB MATH FUNCTIONS F, P1046
[2]   An objective function for radiation treatment optimization based on local biological measures [J].
Alber, M ;
Nüsslin, F .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (02) :479-493
[3]   Optimized planning using physical objectives and constraints [J].
Bortfeld, T .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 1999, 9 (01) :20-+
[4]   Optimized radiation therapy based on radiobiological objectives [J].
Brahme, A .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 1999, 9 (01) :35-47
[5]  
Brahme A, 2001, ACTA ONCOL, V40, P725
[6]   FITTING OF NORMAL TISSUE TOLERANCE DATA TO AN ANALYTIC-FUNCTION [J].
BURMAN, C ;
KUTCHER, GJ ;
EMAMI, B ;
GOITEIN, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (01) :123-135
[7]   Optimization of intensity modulated beams with volume constraints using two methods: Cost function minimization and projections onto convex sets [J].
Cho, PS ;
Lee, S ;
Marks, RJ ;
Oh, SH ;
Sutlief, SG ;
Phillips, MH .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (04) :435-443
[8]   The generalized equivalent uniform dose function as a basis for intensity-modulated treatment planning [J].
Choi, B ;
Deasy, J .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (20) :3579-3589
[9]   A multiobjective gradient-based dose optimization algorithm for external beam conformal radiotherapy [J].
Cotrutz, C ;
Lahanas, M ;
Kappas, C ;
Baltas, D .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (08) :2161-2175
[10]   Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with or without intensity modulated beams: A planning comparison [J].
De Meerleer, GO ;
Vakaet, LAML ;
De Gersem, WRT ;
De Wagter, C ;
De Naeyer, B ;
De Neve, W .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 47 (03) :639-648