Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine for Epidural Labor Analgesia
被引:70
作者:
Beilin, Yaakov
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
NYU, Dept Anesthesiol, Mt Sinai Sch Med, New York, NY 10016 USA
NYU, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Mt Sinai Sch Med, New York, NY 10016 USANYU, Dept Anesthesiol, Mt Sinai Sch Med, New York, NY 10016 USA
Beilin, Yaakov
[1
,2
]
Halpern, Stephen
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Obstet Anesthesia, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, CanadaNYU, Dept Anesthesiol, Mt Sinai Sch Med, New York, NY 10016 USA
Halpern, Stephen
[3
]
机构:
[1] NYU, Dept Anesthesiol, Mt Sinai Sch Med, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Mt Sinai Sch Med, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Obstet Anesthesia, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
Neuraxial analgesia is frequently administered to women in labor. For many years, bupivacaine has been used because of its long duration of action, lack of excessive motor block, and minimal fetal and neonatal effects. However, bupivacaine is one of the most cardiotoxic local anesthetics in current use and motor block is still a problem. Many local anesthetics such as bupivacaine exist in 2 forms, levorotatory and dextrorotatory. Ropivacaine, an amide local anesthetic produced in the pure levorotatory form addresses some of the concerns related to bupivacaine. In this article, we present the literature comparing ropivacaine and bupivacaine to determine whether there is an advantage to using one of these local anesthetics for labor analgesia. We found that there is no advantage to the routine use of ropivacaine for labor analgesia. (Anesth Analg 2010;111:482-7)