Centrality measures and the importance of generalist species in pollination networks

被引:380
作者
Martin Gonzalez, Ana M. [1 ,2 ]
Dalsgaard, Bo [2 ]
Olesen, Jens M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Unit Ecol, CREAF, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Biol Sci, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
关键词
Betweenness centrality; Closeness centrality; Generalization level; Pollination networks; Keystone species; COEVOLUTIONARY NETWORKS; INSECT POLLINATION; BIODIVERSITY; COMMUNITY; SPECIALIZATION; CONSERVATION; COMPLEXITY; TOLERANCE; DECLINES; ECOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.03.008
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Studies of complex networks show that nodes with high centrality scores are important to network structure and stability. Following this rationale, centrality measures can be used to (i) identify keystone species in ecological networks, a major issue in community ecology, and (ii) differentiate the keystone species concept, e.g. species may play a key role in a network for different topological reasons. In 34 pollination communities we examine the relationship between the generalization level of species (ND) and two complementary centrality indices: closeness (CC) and betweenness centrality (BC). CC measures the proximity of a species to all other species in the community, while BC describes the importance of a species as a connector. Most networks had a linear ND-CC relationship with a minimum CC value of 0.41. Hence, species were close to each and will be likely to be rapidly affected by disturbances. Contrarily, in most networks, the ND-BC relationships were power-law distributed with exponents larger than one. Only 59% of the species were connectors (BC > 0). In particular, there was a connector threshold value of ND = 0.46. Species above this threshold represent similar to 40%, almost all of which were connectors. These results indicate that in pollination systems the most generalized species are usually network keystone species, playing at least two roles: (i) interact closely with most other species (high CC) and (ii) connect otherwise unconnected subnetworks (high BC). We discuss the implications of centrality measures to community-based conservation ecology. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 43
页数:8
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Error and attack tolerance of complex networks [J].
Albert, R ;
Jeong, H ;
Barabási, AL .
NATURE, 2000, 406 (6794) :378-382
[2]  
Allen-Wardell G, 1998, CONSERV BIOL, V12, P8
[3]  
[Anonymous], ARXIVPHYSICS0605220
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511815478
[5]   COMMUNITY STUDIES IN POLLINATION ECOLOGY IN THE HIGH TEMPERATE ANDES OF CENTRAL CHILE .1. POLLINATION MECHANISMS AND ALTITUDINAL VARIATION [J].
ARROYO, MTK ;
PRIMACK, R ;
ARMESTO, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1982, 69 (01) :82-97
[6]   Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance [J].
Bascompte, J ;
Jordano, P ;
Olesen, JM .
SCIENCE, 2006, 312 (5772) :431-433
[7]   The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks [J].
Bascompte, J ;
Jordano, P ;
Melián, CJ ;
Olesen, JM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (16) :9383-9387
[8]   The signature of phylogenetic constraints on food-web structure [J].
Bersier, Louis-Felix ;
Kehrli, Patrik .
ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2008, 5 (02) :132-139
[9]   Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands [J].
Biesmeijer, J. C. ;
Roberts, S. P. M. ;
Reemer, M. ;
Ohlemueller, R. ;
Edwards, M. ;
Peeters, T. ;
Schaffers, A. P. ;
Potts, S. G. ;
Kleukers, R. ;
Thomas, C. D. ;
Settele, J. ;
Kunin, W. E. .
SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5785) :351-354
[10]   Pollination networks and functional specialization: a test using Lesser Antillean plant-hummingbird assemblages [J].
Dalsgaard, Bo ;
Gonzalez, Ana M. Martin ;
Olesen, Jens M. ;
Timmermann, Allan ;
Andersen, Laila H. ;
Ollerton, Jeff .
OIKOS, 2008, 117 (05) :789-793