The bad apple theory won't work: response to 'Challenging the systems approach: why adverse event rates are not improving' by Dr Levitt

被引:6
作者
Dekker, Sidney W. A. [1 ]
Leveson, Nancy G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Safety Sci Innovat Lab, HUM, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[2] MIT, Aeronaut & Astronaut & Engn Syst Div, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003585
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:1050 / U116
页数:2
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]   ACCIDENT STATISTICS AND THE CONCEPT OF ACCIDENT-PRONENESS .1. A CRITICAL EVALUATION .2. THE MATHEMATICAL BACKGROUND [J].
ARBOUS, AG ;
KERRICH, JE .
BIOMETRICS, 1951, 7 (04) :340-432
[2]  
Burnham John., ACCIDENT PRONE HIST
[3]  
Fitts Paul M., 1947, Analysis of Factors Contributing to 460 "Pilot Error" Experiences in Operating Aircraft Controls, Memorandum Report TSEAA-694-12
[4]   Challenging the systems approach: why adverse event rates are not improving [J].
Levitt, Philip .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2014, 23 (12) :1051-1052
[5]   'Bad apples': time to redefine as a type of systems problem? [J].
Shojania, Kaveh G. ;
Dixon-Woods, Mary .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2013, 22 (07) :528-531
[6]   Balancing "No Blame" with Accountability in Patient Safety. [J].
Wachter, Robert M. ;
Pronovost, Peter J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (14) :1401-1406
[7]  
Woods DD, HUMAN ERROR 2010