Statistical process control as a tool for controlling operating room performance: retrospective analysis and benchmarking

被引:12
作者
Chen, Tsung-Tai [1 ]
Chang, Yun-Jau [1 ,2 ]
Ku, Shei-Ling [3 ]
Chung, Kuo-Piao [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Inst Hlth Care Org Adm, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Taipei City Hosp, Zhongxiao Branch, Dept Gen Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Cathay Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Insurance Res, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
control chart; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; operating room performance; statistical process control; MONITORING MORTALITY-RATES; HEALTH-CARE IMPROVEMENT; CORONARY-ARTERY-BYPASS; RISK-ADJUSTED CUSUM; CONTROL CHARTS; EMERGENCY-MEDICINE; QUALITY; SYSTEM; INDICATORS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01213.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background There is much research using statistical process control (SPC) to monitor surgical performance, including comparisons among groups to detect small process shifts, but few of these studies have included a stabilization process. This study aimed to analyse the performance of surgeons in operating room (OR) and set a benchmark by SPC after stabilized process. Methods The OR profile of 499 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by 16 surgeons at a tertiary hospital in Taiwan during 2005 and 2006 were recorded. SPC was applied to analyse operative and non-operative times using the following five steps: first, the times were divided into two segments; second, they were normalized; third, they were evaluated as individual processes; fourth, the ARL(0) was calculated;, and fifth, the different groups (surgeons) were compared. Outliers were excluded to ensure stability for each group and to facilitate inter-group comparison. Results The results showed that in the stabilized process, only one surgeon exhibited a significantly shorter total process time (including operative time and non-operative time). Conclusion In this study, we use five steps to demonstrate how to control surgical and non-surgical time in phase I. There are some measures that can be taken to prevent skew and instability in the process. Also, using SPC, one surgeon can be shown to be a real benchmark.
引用
收藏
页码:905 / 910
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [21] Direct comparison of risk-adjusted and non-risk-adjusted CUSUM analyses of coronary artery bypass surgery outcomes
    Novick, Richard J.
    Fox, Stephanie A.
    Stitt, Larry W.
    Forbes, Thomas L.
    Steiner, Stefan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 132 (02) : 386 - 391
  • [22] Control chart methods for monitoring cardiac surgical performance and their interpretation
    Rogers, CA
    Reeves, BC
    Caputo, M
    Ganesh, JS
    Bonser, RS
    Angelini, GD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 128 (06) : 811 - 819
  • [23] Schuster M, 2007, ANAESTHESIST, V56, P259, DOI 10.1007/s00101-006-1126-0
  • [24] Statistical process control as a tool for monitoring nonoperative time
    Seim, Andreas
    Andersen, Bjorn
    Sandberg, Warren S.
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 105 (02) : 370 - 380
  • [25] Shapiro S.S., 1990, How To Test Normality and Other Distributional Assumptions
  • [26] The CUSUM chart method as a tool for continuous monitoring of clinical outcomes using routinely collected data
    Sibanda, Thabani
    Sibanda, Nokuthaba
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2007, 7 (1)
  • [27] Risk-adjusted sequential probability ratio tests: applications to Bristol, Shipman and adult cardiac surgery
    Spiegelhalter, D
    Grigg, O
    Kinsman, R
    Treasure, T
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 15 (01) : 7 - 13
  • [28] *STAT, 2005, STAT SOFTW
  • [29] Steiner S H, 2000, Biostatistics, V1, P441, DOI 10.1093/biostatistics/1.4.441
  • [30] Modeling the uncertainty of surgical procedure times - Comparison of log-normal and normal models
    Strum, DP
    May, JH
    Vargas, LG
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 92 (04) : 1160 - 1167