Energy and environmental efficiency of China's transportation sectors considering CO2 emission uncertainty

被引:91
作者
Wei, Fangqing [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoqi [1 ]
Chu, Junfei [2 ]
Yang, Feng [1 ]
Yuan, Zhe [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei 230026, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Changsha 410083, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Leonard de Vinci Pole Univ, Res Ctr, F-92916 Paris, France
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Energy and environmental efficiency; Transportation sector; Data envelopment analysis; Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis; CO2 emission uncertainty; MULTICRITERIA ACCEPTABILITY ANALYSIS; CARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; PERFORMANCE; DEA; INDUSTRY; SYSTEMS; IMPACT; FIRMS; DMUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.trd.2021.102955
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China's transportation sector suffers from energy over-consumption and CO2 over-emission, resulting in increasing pressure to improve energy and environmental efficiency. Current measurement techniques cannot produce precise CO2 emission data, and this uncertainty makes previous approaches problematic for analyzing energy and environmental efficiency. This study combines stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA-2) with data envelopment analysis (DEA) to evaluate the energy and environmental efficiency of Chinese transportation sectors in the presence of uncertain CO2 emission data. The improved SMAA-DEA approach effectively handles CO2 data uncertainty and also considers all possible input and output weights, thus providing meaningful information (such as maximum efficiency, average efficiency, and rank acceptability index) to guide the development of effective policies to improve efficiency. This study's empirical findings show that the energy and environmental efficiency of transportation sectors in 30 provincial regions is poor, great efficiency disparities exist between regions, and uneven development has occurred in China.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 66 条
[41]   A holistic approach to compare energy efficiencies of different transport modes [J].
Ramanathan, R .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (11) :743-747
[42]  
Ritchie H., 2020, CO2 Emissions
[43]  
Rypdal K., 2001, P ENV SCI POLICY, P107, DOI [10.1016/S1462-9011(00)00113-1, DOI 10.1016/S1462-9011(00)00113-1]
[44]   A new robust optimization approach to common weights formulation in DEA [J].
Salahi, Maziar ;
Toloo, Mehdi ;
Torabi, Narges .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2021, 72 (06) :1390-1402
[45]   Ranking Intervals and Dominance Relations for Ratio-Based Efficiency Analysis [J].
Salo, Ahti ;
Punkka, Antti .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 57 (01) :200-214
[46]   Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation [J].
Seiford, LM ;
Zhu, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 142 (01) :16-20
[47]   Multi-criteria project portfolio selection and scheduling problem based on acceptability analysis [J].
Song, Shiling ;
Yang, Feng ;
Xia, Qiong .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 135 :793-799
[48]   Sustainability assessment of inland transportation in China: A triple bottom line-based network DEA approach [J].
Stefaniec, Agnieszka ;
Hosseini, Keyvan ;
Xie, Jianhui ;
Li, Yongjun .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 80
[49]   A literature study for DEA applied to energy and environment [J].
Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki ;
Yuan, Yan ;
Goto, Mika .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 62 :104-124
[50]   Implementing stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis [J].
Tervonen, Tommi ;
Lahdelma, Risto .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 178 (02) :500-513