Orthosis versus no orthosis for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic injury: a multicenter prospective randomized equivalence trial

被引:74
作者
Bailey, Christopher S. [1 ]
Urquhart, Jennifer C. [1 ]
Dvorak, Marcel F. [2 ,3 ]
Nadeau, Melissa [1 ]
Boyd, Michael C. [2 ,3 ]
Thomas, Ken C. [4 ]
Kwon, Brian K. [2 ,3 ]
Gurr, Kevin R. [2 ,3 ]
Bailey, Stewart I. [1 ]
Fisher, Charles G. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, London Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Orthopaed, Dept Surg, London, ON N6A 4G5, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Orthopaed, Div Spine, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[3] Vancouver Coastal Hlth, Combined Neurosurg & Orthopaed Spine Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Foothills Med Ctr, Dept Surg Orthoped & Neurosci, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
关键词
Thoracolumbar burst fracture; Orthosis; Brace; Functional outcome; Equivalence trial; LOW-BACK-PAIN; NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT; LUMBAR SPINE; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; FOLLOW-UP; DEFICIT; JUNCTION; CLASSIFICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.017
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Thoracolumbar burst fractures have good outcomes when treated with early ambulation and orthosis (TLSO). If equally good outcomes could be achieved with early ambulation and no brace, resource utilization would be decreased, especially in developing countries where prolonged bed rest is the default option because bracing is not available or affordable. PURPOSE: To determine whether TLSO is equivalent to no orthosis (NO) in the treatment of acute AO Type A3 thoracolumbar burst fractures with respect to their functional outcome at 3 months. STUDY DESIGN: A multicentre, randomized, nonblinded equivalence trial involving three Canadian tertiary spine centers. Enrollment began in 2002 and 2-year follow-up was completed in 2011. PATIENT SAMPLE: Inclusion criteria included AO-A3 burst fractures between T11 and L3, skeletally mature and older than 60 years, 72 hours from their injury, kyphotic deformity lower than 35 degrees, no neurologic deficit. One hundred ten patients were assessed for eligibility for the study; 14 patients were not recruited because they resided outside the country (3), refused participation (8), or were not consented before independent ambulation (3). OUTCOME MEASURES: Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire score (RMDQ) assessed at 3 months postinjury. The equivalence margin was set at delta=5 points. METHODS: The NO group was encouraged to ambulate immediately with bending restrictions for 8 weeks. The TLSO group ambulated when the brace was available and weaned from the brace after 8 to 10 weeks. The following competitive grants supported this work: VHHSC Interdisciplinary Research Grant, Zimmer/University of British Columbia Research Fund, and Hip Hip Hooray Research Grant. Aspen Medical provided the TLSOs used in this study. The authors have no financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence this work. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were enrolled into the TLSO group and 49 patients into the NO group. Forty-six participants per group were available for the primary outcome. The RMDQ score at 3 months postinjury was 6.8 +/- 5.4 (standard deviation [SD]) for the TLSO group and 7.7 +/- 6.0 (SD) in the NO group. The 95% confidence interval (-1.5 to 3.2) was within the predetermined margin of equivalence. Six patients required surgical stabilization, five of them before initial discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Treating these fractures using early ambulation without a brace avoids the cost and patient deconditioning associated with a brace and complications and costs associated with long-term bed rest if a TLSO or body cast is not available. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2557 / 2564
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Aligizakis A, 2002, Acta Orthop Belg, V68, P279
[2]  
Aligizakis A., 2002, Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, V12, P36, DOI [10.1007/s00590-002-0014-9, DOI 10.1007/S00590-002-0014-9]
[3]   Comparison of thoracolumbosacral orthosis and no orthosis for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: interim analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical equivalence trial Clinical article [J].
Bailey, Christopher S. ;
Dvorak, Marcel F. ;
Thomas, Kenneth C. ;
Boyd, Michael C. ;
Paquett, Scott ;
Kwon, Brian K. ;
France, John ;
Gurr, Kevin R. ;
Bailey, Stewart I. ;
Fisher, Charles G. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2009, 11 (03) :295-303
[4]   SEGMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE SAGITTAL PLANE ALIGNMENT OF THE NORMAL THORACIC AND LUMBAR SPINES AND THORACOLUMBAR JUNCTION [J].
BERNHARDT, M ;
BRIDWELL, KH .
SPINE, 1989, 14 (07) :717-721
[5]   NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF STABLE THORACOLUMBAR BURST FRACTURES WITH EARLY AMBULATION AND BRACING [J].
CANTOR, JB ;
LEBWOHL, NH ;
GARVEY, T ;
EISMONT, FJ .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (08) :971-976
[6]   Functional outcome of thoracolumbar burst fractures managed with hyperextension casting or bracing and early mobilization [J].
Chow, GH ;
Nelson, BJ ;
Gebhard, JS ;
Brugman, JL ;
Brown, CW ;
Donaldson, DH .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (18) :2170-2175
[8]   The short form-36 health survey questionnaire in spine surgery [J].
Grevitt, M ;
Khazim, R ;
Webb, J ;
Mulholland, R ;
Shepperd, J .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1997, 79B (01) :48-52
[9]   The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures [J].
Hudak, PL ;
Wright, JG .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) :3167-3177
[10]   CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT OF BURST FRACTURES OF THE THORACOLUMBAR AND LUMBAR SPINE [J].
KINOSHITA, H ;
NAGATA, Y ;
UEDA, H ;
KISHI, K .
PARAPLEGIA, 1993, 31 (01) :58-67