Ten reasons why a thermalized system cannot be described by a many-particle wave function

被引:8
作者
Drossel, Barbara [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Darmstadt, Inst Festkorperphys, Hsch Str 6, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany
来源
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF MODERN PHYSICS | 2017年 / 58卷
关键词
MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS; STATISTICAL-MECHANICS; QUANTUM; THERMODYNAMICS; GRAVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.04.001
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
It is widely believed that the underlying reality behind statistical mechanics is a deterministic and unitary time evolution of a many-particle wave function, even though this is in conflict with the irreversible, stochastic nature of statistical mechanics. The usual attempts to resolve this conflict for instance by appealing to decoherence or eigenstate thermalization are riddled with problems. This paper considers theoretical physics of thermalized systems as it is done in practice and shows that all approaches to thermalized systems presuppose in some form limits to linear superposition and deterministic time evolution. These considerations include, among others, the classical limit, extensivity, the concepts of entropy and equilibrium, and symmetry breaking in phase transitions and quantum measurement. As a conclusion, the paper suggests that the irreversibility and stochasticity of statistical mechanics should be taken as a real property of nature. It follows that a gas of a macroscopic number N of atoms in thermal equilibrium is best represented by a collection of N wave packets of a size of the order of the thermal de Broglie wave length, which behave quantum mechanically below this scale but classically sufficiently far beyond this scale. In particular, these wave packets must localize again after scattering events, which requires stochasticity and indicates a connection to the measurement process. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 21
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: a response to P.W. Anderson
    Adler, SL
    [J]. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2003, 34B (01): : 135 - 142
  • [2] Allahverdyan A. E., 2005, QUANTPH0508162 ARXIV
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2000, MODERN METHODS ALGOR
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2012, QUANTUM DISSIPATIVE
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2005, Advanced Quantum Mechanics
  • [6] STATISTICAL INTERPRETATION OF QUANTUM MECHANICS
    BALLENTI.LE
    [J]. REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 1970, 42 (04) : 358 - &
  • [7] Models of wave-function collapse, underlying theories, and experimental tests
    Bassi, Angelo
    Lochan, Kinjalk
    Satin, Seema
    Singh, Tejinder P.
    Ulbricht, Hendrik
    [J]. REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2013, 85 (02) : 471 - 527
  • [8] Breuer H.-P., 2007, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems
  • [9] PATH INTEGRAL APPROACH TO QUANTUM BROWNIAN-MOTION
    CALDEIRA, AO
    LEGGETT, AJ
    [J]. PHYSICA A, 1983, 121 (03): : 587 - 616
  • [10] Taking thermodynamics too seriously
    Callender, C
    [J]. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2001, 32B (04): : 539 - 553