Maternal-choice caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth in low-risk primigravid women

被引：3

作者：

Robson, Stephen J. ^{[1
]}

de Costa, Caroline ^{[2
]}

Woods, Cindy ^{[3
]}

Ding, Pauline ^{[4
]}

Rane, Ajay ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Australian Natl Univ, Med Sch, Garran, ACT, Australia

[2] James Cook Univ, Coll Med & Dent, Cairns, Qld, Australia

[3] Univ New England, Sch Hlth, Armidale, NSW, Australia

[4] Australian Natl Univ, Dept Math Sci, Acton, ACT, Australia

[5] James Cook Univ, Sch Med & Dent, Townsville, Qld, Australia

来源：

AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY | 2018年 / 58卷 / 04期

基金：

美国国家卫生研究院;

关键词：

caesarean section; labour; logistic regression; maternal age; population; REQUEST; DELIVERY; OBSTETRICIANS; HEALTH; TERM;

D O I：

10.1111/ajo.12766

中图分类号：

R71 [妇产科学];

学科分类号：

100211 ;

摘要：

Rising rates of caesarean section (CS) have been attributed, in part, to maternal-choice CS (MCCS). There are few published data regarding maternal and perinatal risks comparing MCCS with planned vaginal birth (VB) in uncomplicated first pregnancies to inform choice. We report the results of a pragmatic patient-preference cohort study of private patients in Australia: 64 women planning MCCS and 113 women planning VB. There were few differences in outcome between the two groups. The study highlighted the well-recognised difficulties in undertaking prospective research into MCCS.

引用

页码：469 / 473

页数：5

共 18 条

[1] INCREASED RISK OF POSTNATAL DEPRESSION AFTER EMERGENCY CESAREAN-SECTION [J].

BOYCE, PM ;

TODD, AL .

MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1992, 157 (03) :172-174

[2] Planned Vaginal Birth or Elective Repeat Caesarean: Patient Preference Restricted Cohort with Nested Randomised Trial [J].

Crowther, Caroline A. ;

Dodd, Jodie M. ;

Hiller, Janet E. ;

Haslam, Ross R. ;

Robinson, Jeffrey S. .

PLOS MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (03)

[3] Caesarean section on maternal request for non-medical reasons: Putting the UK National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines in perspective [J].

D'Souza, Rohan .

BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 27 (02) :165-177

[4] AGAINST: Women need accessible evidence-based information on caesarean section [J].

Easter, Abigail .

BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (03) :359-359

[5] Elective Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request [J].

Ecker, Jeffrey .

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 309 (18) :1930-1936

[6] PROPHYLACTIC CESAREAN-SECTION AT TERM [J].

FELDMAN, GB ;

FREIMAN, JA .

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (19) :1264-1267

[7]

FIGO Committee for the Study of Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women's Health, 1995, ETH ISS OBST GYN

[8] Caesarean section should be available on request FOR: The mother's autonomy should be paramount [J].

Gee, Harold .

BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (03) :359-359

[9] Maternal mortality and mode of delivery [J].

Hall, MH ;

Bewley, S .

LANCET, 1999, 354 (9180) :776-776

[10] Caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term [J].

Lavender, Tina ;

Hofmeyr, G. Justus ;

Neilson, James P. ;

Kingdon, Carol ;

Gyte, Gillian M. L. .

COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (03)

← 1 2 →