Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on cardiovascular events, death, and major safety outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:347
作者
Wu, Jason H. Y. [1 ]
Foote, Celine [1 ,2 ]
Blomster, Juuso [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Toyama, Tadashi [1 ]
Perkovic, Vlado [1 ,5 ]
Sundstrom, Johan [1 ,6 ]
Neal, Bruce [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
[2] Concord Repatriat Gen Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Turku, Turku, Finland
[4] Univ Gothenberg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Uppsala Clin Res Ctr, Dept Med Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
[7] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
INADEQUATE GLYCEMIC CONTROL; ADD-ON THERAPY; SELECTIVE SGLT2 INHIBITOR; DRUG-NAIVE PATIENTS; LONG-TERM EFFICACY; DOUBLE-BLIND; BLOOD-PRESSURE; BODY-WEIGHT; FOLLOW-UP; DAPAGLIFLOZIN MONOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/S2213-8587(16)00052-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background In patients with type 2 diabetes, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are known to reduce glucose concentrations, blood pressure, and weight, but to increase LDL cholesterol and the incidence of urogenital infections. Protection against cardiovascular events has also been reported, as have possible increased risks of adverse outcomes such as ketoacidosis and bone fracture. We aimed to establish the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular events, death, and safety outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes, both overall and separately for individual drugs. Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and websites of US, European, and Japanese regulatory authorities from Jan 1, 1950, to Sept 30, 2015, for data from prospective randomised controlled trials assessing the effects of SGLT2 treatment compared with controls. We excluded duplicate reports, trials of compound drugs, trials that lasted 7 days or fewer, trials that did not report on outcomes of interest, and articles that presented pooled trial data for which the individual trials could not be identified. We extracted data in duplicate using a standardised approach. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, admission to hospital for unstable angina, heart failure, and all-cause mortality. We estimated summary relative risks with fixed-effects meta-analysis, with the I-2 statistic used to estimate heterogeneity of results beyond chance. Findings The analyses included data from six regulatory submissions (37 525 participants) and 57 published trials (33 385 participants), which provided data for seven different SGLT2 inhibitors. SGLT2 inhibitors protected against the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (relative risk 0.84 [95% CI 0.75-0.95]; p=0.006), cardiovascular death (0.63 [0.51-0.77]; p<0.0001), heart failure (0.65 [0.50-0.85]; p=0.002), and death from any cause (0.71 [0.61-0.83]; p<0.0001). No clear effect was apparent for non-fatal myocardial infarction (0.88 [0.72-1.07]; p=0.18) or angina (0.95 [0.73-1.23]; p=0.70), but we noted an adverse effect for non-fatal stroke (1.30 [1.00-1.68]; p=0.049). We noted no clear evidence that the individual drugs had different effects on cardiovascular outcomes or death (all I I-2 < 43%). Safety analyses showed consistent increased risks of genital infections (regulatory submissions 4.75 [4.00-5.63]; scientific reports 2.88 [2.48-3.34]), but findings for some safety outcomes varied depending on whether anlayses were based on data extracted from regulatory submissions or trials reported in the scientific literature. Interpretation These data suggest net protection of SGLT2 inhibitors against cardiovascular outcomes and death. The efficacy results were driven by findings for empagliflozin (the only SGLT2 inhibitor for which data from a dedicated long-term cardiovascular safety trial have been reported), although results for the other drugs in the class were not clearly different. Adverse events were more difficult to quantify than was efficacy, with the effects of individual drugs in the class seeming to differ for some safety outcomes. Results from ongoing studies will be crucial to substantiate these findings across the drug class, but the available data provide a strong rationale to expect benefit from use of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of cardiovascular events.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 419
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Zaccardi, F.
    Webb, D. R.
    Htike, Z. Z.
    Youssef, D.
    Khunti, K.
    Davies, M. J.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2016, 18 (08) : 783 - 794
  • [42] Efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors as monotherapy or add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Zhiying
    Sun, Jiahui
    Han, Ruobing
    Fan, Dongzhu
    Dong, Xinyi
    Luan, Zenghui
    Xiang, Rongwu
    Zhao, Mingyi
    Yang, Jingyu
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2018, 20 (01) : 113 - 120
  • [43] No disparity of the efficacy and all-cause mortality between Asian and non-Asian type 2 diabetes patients with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors treatment: A meta-analysis
    Cai, Xiaoling
    Gao, Xueying
    Yang, Wenjia
    Chen, Yifei
    Zhang, Simin
    Zhou, Lingli
    Han, Xueyao
    Ji, Linong
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION, 2018, 9 (04) : 850 - 861
  • [44] Effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Baker, William L.
    Smyth, Lindsay R.
    Riche, Daniel M.
    Bourret, Emily M.
    Chamberlin, Kevin W.
    White, William B.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HYPERTENSION, 2014, 8 (04) : 262 - 275
  • [45] Efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate renal function impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Lin
    Zhang, Mei
    Lv, Qingguo
    Tong, Nanwei
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 140 : 295 - 303
  • [46] Comparative Effects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors on Serum Electrolyte Levels in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhang, Jingjing
    Huan, Yonghong
    Leibensperger, Mark
    Seo, Bojung
    Song, Yiqing
    KIDNEY360, 2022, 3 (03): : 477 - 487
  • [47] Role of sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in type I diabetes mellitus
    Ahmadieh, Hala
    Ghazal, Nisrine
    Azar, Sami T.
    DIABETES METABOLIC SYNDROME AND OBESITY-TARGETS AND THERAPY, 2017, 10 : 161 - 167
  • [48] Efficacy and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Korean Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Real-World Clinical Practice
    Hong, A. Ram
    Koo, Bo Kyung
    Kim, Sang Wan
    Yi, Ka Hee
    Moon, Min Kyong
    DIABETES & METABOLISM JOURNAL, 2019, 43 (05) : 590 - 606
  • [49] Rationale for the Early Use of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
    Handelsman, Yehuda
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2019, 36 (10) : 2567 - 2586
  • [50] Effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on blood pressure in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Min Li
    Tieci Yi
    Fangfang Fan
    Lin Qiu
    Zhi Wang
    Haoyu Weng
    Wei Ma
    Yan Zhang
    Yong Huo
    Cardiovascular Diabetology, 21