Factors that influence cooperation in networks for innovation and learning

被引:9
作者
Sie, Rory L. L. [1 ]
Bitter-Rijpkema, Marlies [1 ]
Stoyanov, Slavi [1 ]
Sloep, Peter B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ Netherlands, Ctr Learning Sci & Technol, NL-6419 AT Heerlen, Netherlands
关键词
Cooperation; Networked innovation; Recommender systems; Coalition formation; Delphi method; Hierarchical cluster analysis; DELPHI; KNOWLEDGE; POWER; COMMUNITIES; TECHNOLOGY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.033
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Innovation networks and learning networks share the same cooperative intention, but they too often fail as members of the network do not know which partnerships are valuable. If one plans to build a support service that provides insight into the value of future cooperation, one first needs to know what contributes to effective and efficient cooperation. In addition to carrying out a literature review, we invoked the eDelphi method to answer this question. eDelphi is a method to solicit knowledge from experts anonymously and without geographical constraints. Observations from two eDelphi rounds are reported in this article. The first round focused on factor generation and determined which factors influence cooperation networks; it was conducted with two groups of six representative experts. Experts list open communication, a positive attitude, trust, keeping appointments, and personality as influential factors for cooperation networks. A team of four moderators categorised the factors in a second round, resulting in four core clusters: personal characteristics, diversity, effective cooperation, and managerial aspects. Interestingly the experts failed to list some factors that are mentioned in the literature. This finding is discussed. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 384
页数:8
相关论文
共 58 条
[21]  
GALLUPE RB, 1992, ACAD MANAGE J, V35, P350, DOI 10.5465/256377
[22]  
HART S, 1987, NEW PALGRAVE, P318
[23]   Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique [J].
Hasson, F ;
Keeney, S ;
McKenna, H .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2000, 32 (04) :1008-1015
[24]   Social network size in humans [J].
Hill, RA ;
Dunbar, RIM .
HUMAN NATURE-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY BIOSOCIAL PERSPECTIVE, 2003, 14 (01) :53-72
[25]  
IBARRA H, 1993, ACAD MANAGE J, V36, P471, DOI 10.5465/256589
[27]  
Janis I.L., 1982, Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes
[28]  
Jarvenpaa S. L., 1998, JCMC, V3
[29]  
Jensen M, 2008, ACAD MANAGE J, V51, P495
[30]   A reciprocal influence model of social power: Emerging principles and lines of inquiry [J].
Keltner, Dacher ;
Van Kleef, Gerben A. ;
Chen, Serena ;
Kraus, Michael W. .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY-BOOK, 2008, 40 :151-192