AVG and 1-MCP effects on maturity and quality of apple fruit at harvest and after storage

被引:9
作者
Argenta, L. C. [1 ]
Vieira, Mj. [1 ]
Krammes, J. G. [1 ]
Petri, J. L. [1 ]
Basso, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] EPAGRI, Estacao Expt, BR-89500000 Cacador, SC, Brazil
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE XTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PLANT BIOREGULATORS IN FRUIT PRODUCTION | 2006年 / 727期
关键词
Malus x domestica; ripening; storage; ethylene;
D O I
10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.727.61
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
'Gala', 'Royal Gala' and 'Imperial Gala' apples (Malus x domestica Borkh.) from commercial orchards in Southern Brazil were sprayed with 120 g ha(-1) AVG (aminoethoxyvinylglycine, ReTain (TM)) 4 weeks before the estimated commercial harvest date in two growing seasons. Fruit were harvested every 5 to 7 days, starting 2-3 weeks before the estimated commercial harvest date. AVG-treated and untreated fruit, harvested at the end of the optimum commercial maturity window for long term storage (similar to 75 N) were treated with 1 mu L L-1 1-MCP (1-methyleyelopropene, SmartFresh (TM)) on the day of harvest, and stored for 3, 5 or 7 months in air (0.5 degrees C), or in controlled atmosphere (CA, 1.5 kPa O-2 + 2.5 kPa CO2 at 0.5 degrees C). Fruit maturity and quality were determined at harvest and after cold storage plus 7 days at 20 degrees C. Treatment with AVG delayed fruit ripening on the trees as indicated by internal ethylene concentration, fruit firmness, starch index and peel ground color. AVG treated fruit reached creamy-white peel background color and firmness of approximately 75 N 8 to 18 days later than untreated fruit, depending on cultivar and season. Pre-harvest treatment with AVG had little or no effect on rate of fruit softening and incidence of senescent internal browning after storage when fruit were harvested with firmness equivalent to that of control, regardless of storage conditions and post-harvest treatment with 1-MCP. The highest fruit firmness and the lowest incidence of senescent internal browning were observed on CA stored fruit treated with 1-MCP, regardless of pre-harvest treatment with AVG. Results indicate that possible differences in fruit quality after storage between AVG- and non-AVG-treated fruit are normally relative to differences in fruit maturity at harvest.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / +
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Abeles FB., 1992, Ethylene in Plant Biology, V2 nd, P414, DOI DOI 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90043-P
[2]  
Amarante Cassandro Vidal Talamini do, 2002, Rev. Bras. Frutic., V24, P661, DOI 10.1590/S0100-29452002000300022
[3]  
Argenta Luiz Carlos, 1994, Revista Brasileira de Fisiologia Vegetal, V6, P135
[4]  
AUTIO WR, 1982, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V107, P1074
[5]  
BANGERTH F, 1978, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V103, P401
[6]  
BRAMLAGE WJ, 1980, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V105, P847
[7]  
Byers R. E., 1997, Journal of Tree Fruit Production, V2, P77, DOI 10.1300/J072v02n01_06
[8]   INHIBITION OF AUTOCATALYTIC C2H4-BIOSYNTHESIS BY AVG APPLICATIONS AND CONSEQUENCES ON THE PHYSIOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR AND QUALITY OF APPLE FRUITS IN COOL STORAGE [J].
HALDERDOLL, H ;
BANGERTH, F .
SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 1987, 33 (1-2) :87-96
[9]   Low ethylene controlled atmosphere induces adverse effects on the quality of 'Cox's Orange Pippin' apples treated with aminoethoxyvinylglycine during fruit development [J].
Johnson, DS ;
Colgan, RJ .
POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 27 (01) :59-68
[10]   BIOSYNTHESIS AND ACTION OF ETHYLENE [J].
LIEBERMAN, M .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1979, 30 :533-591