Procurement and Governance Choices for Collaborative Infrastructure Projects

被引:18
|
作者
Chen, Le [1 ]
Manley, Karen [1 ]
Lewis, Joanne [1 ]
Helfer, Fernanda [2 ]
Widen, Kristian [3 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Fac Sci & Engn, Sch Civil Engn & Built Environm, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Sch Engn, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[3] Halmstad Univ, Sch Business Engn & Sci, S-30105 Halmstad, Sweden
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Construction; Procurement; Infrastructure; Australia; Relational governance; Project alliance; Partnering; Integrated project delivery; Early contractor involvement; PERFORMANCE; MECHANISMS; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001525
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Collaborative approaches to infrastructure procurement are increasingly popular around the world due to their potential to provide improved project performance compared with more traditional approaches. The problem is that project outcomes continue to be unpredictable. Previous research has shown that this is the case regardless of whether the chosen procurement approach is based on price or nonprice selection of the project team. This is a major choice that clients make, but the presented research shows that governance choices for project execution are more important. This is significant because clients tend to focus more on procurement choices and typically do not differentiate governance based on those choices. This needs to change, and the authors show that optimal governance configurations vary on the basis of the chosen type of team configuration. For example, three specific governance arrangements for workshops are highlighted for single teams, and two specific governance arrangements for risk/reward sharing are highlighted for multiple teams. This study identifies governance actions that are associated with superior time and cost outcomes on collaborative infrastructure projects in Australia run by experienced public-sector clients under the two procurement scenarios. Based on a survey of 320 senior managers, independent sample t-tests were conducted to compare the application of governance actions among three distinct groups of projects, based on type of team selection and type of project outcome. The study provides evidence of the most effective approaches to project governance in a country that is a world leader. The results provide much needed recommendations for improved project performance based on large-scale quantitative analysis, which before now has not existed. Overall, the study recommends more attention be paid to noncontractual governance under both approaches to team selection, although the specific actions recommended vary.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Payment options in collaborative procurement of major construction projects
    Wamuziri, Sam
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-MANAGEMENT PROCUREMENT AND LAW, 2013, 166 (01) : 12 - 20
  • [12] Public procurement for carbon reduction in infrastructure projects - an international overview
    Kadefors, A.
    Lingegard, S.
    Alkan-Olsson, J.
    Uppenberg, S.
    Balian, D.
    SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT D-A-CH CONFERENCE 2019 (SBE19 GRAZ), 2019, 323
  • [13] White Collar Crime: Unearthing Collusion in the Procurement of Infrastructure Projects
    Signor, Regis
    Love, Peter E. D.
    Ika, Lavagnon A.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 69 (05) : 1932 - 1943
  • [14] Applying multiple project procurement methods to a portfolio of infrastructure projects
    Miller, JB
    PROCUREMENT SYSTEMS: A GUIDE TO BEST PRACTICE IN CONSTRUCTION, 1999, : 209 - 227
  • [15] CRITICAL FACTORS INFLUENCING INVENTORY AND PROCUREMENT SYSTEM OF INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
    Al-Aidrous, Al Hussein Mohammed Hassan
    Hern, Ng Jenn
    Rahmawati, Yani
    Jahja, Mohamad
    Yusof, Khamaruzaman Wan
    Zawawi, Noor Amila Wan Abdullah
    Utomo, Christiono
    Raflis
    JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 28 (08) : 634 - 645
  • [16] LEADERSHIP AND COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE OF EDUCATIONAL PROJECTS IN THE COMMUNITY
    Diaz-Gibson, Jordi
    Civis Zaragoza, Mireia
    Carrillo Alvarez, Elena
    Cortada Pujol, Meritxell
    PEDAGOGIA SOCIAL REVISTA INTERUNIVERSITARIA, 2015, (26): : 59 - 83
  • [17] Environmental impact assessment of infrastructure projects: a governance perspective
    Chi, Cheryl S. F.
    Ruuska, Inkeri
    Xu, Jianhua
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 59 (03) : 393 - 413
  • [18] The governance of major public infrastructure projects: the process of translation
    Brunet, Maude
    Aubry, Monique
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2018, 11 (01) : 80 - 103
  • [19] Factors Influencing Procurement Adoption in Construction: Building vs Infrastructure Projects
    Sethuraman, Vithyashini
    Perera, B. A. K. S.
    Sumanarathna, D. M. G. A. N. M.
    2ND INTERNATIONAL MERCON 2016 MORATUWA ENGINEERING RESEARCH CONFERENCE, 2016, : 277 - 282
  • [20] Delays in Infrastructure Projects: Main Reasons in the Design, Procurement, and Construction Phases
    Orya, Farid
    Calahorra-Jimenez, Maria
    PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT & POLICY, 2025, 30 (02) : 261 - 280