Connective tissue grafts for thickening peri-implant tissues at implant placement. One-year results from an explanatory split-mouth randomised controlled clinical trial

被引:1
|
作者
Wiesner, Guenter
Esposito, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Worthington, Helen [1 ]
Schlee, Markus
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Dent, Manchester M15 6FH, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Biomat, Sahlgrenska Acad, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
aesthetic; connective tissue graft; dental implant; soft tissue augmentation; randomised controlled clinical trial; GUIDED BONE REGENERATION; SOFT-TISSUE; PRESERVATION; EXTRACTION; AUGMENTATION; RIDGE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate whether connective tissue grafts performed at implant placement could be effective in augmenting pen-implant soft tissues. Materials and methods: Ten partially edentulous patients requiring at least one single implant in the premolar or molar areas of both sides of the mandible were randomised to have one side augmented at implant placement with a connective soft tissue graft harvested from the palate or no augmentation. After 3 months of submerged healing, abutments were placed and within 1 month definitive crowns were permanently cemented. Outcome measures were implant success, any complications, pen-implant marginal bone level changes, patient satisfaction and preference, thickness of the soft tissues and aesthetics (pink aesthetic score) evaluated by an independent and blinded assessor 1 year after loading. Results: One year after loading, no patients dropped out, no implants failed and no complications occurred. Both groups lost statistically significant amounts of pen-implant bone 1 year after loading (0.8 mm in the grafted group and 0.6 mm in the non-grafted group), but there was no statistically significant difference between groups. Soft tissues at augmented sites were 1.3 mm thicker (P < 0.001) and had a significantly better pink aesthetic score (P < 0.001). Patients were highly satisfied (no statistically significant differences between treatments) though they preferred the aesthetics of the augmented sites (P = 0.031). However, five patients would not undergo the grafting procedure again and two were uncertain. Conclusions: Connective tissue grafts are effective in increasing soft tissue thickness, thus improving aesthetics. Longer follow-ups are needed to evaluate the stability of pen-implant tissues over time.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 35
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of anodized titanium abutment collars on peri-implant soft tissue: A split-mouth clinical study
    Farrag, Khaled Mohamed
    Khamis, Mohamed Moataz
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2023, 130 (01): : 59 - 67
  • [2] Microarray expression in peri-implant tissue next to different titanium implant surfaces predicts clinical outcomes: a split-mouth study
    Menini, M.
    Dellepiane, E.
    Baldi, D.
    Longobardi, M. G.
    Pera, P.
    Izzotti, A.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (09) : E121 - E134
  • [3] The comparison of two techniques to increase the amount of peri-implant attached mucosa: free gingival grafts versus vestibuloplasty. One-year results from a randomised controlled trial
    Basegmez, Cansu
    Ersanli, Selim
    Demirel, Korkud
    Bolukbasi, Nilufer
    Yalcin, Serdar
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2012, 5 (02) : 139 - 145
  • [4] The effect of piezoelectric surgery implant osteotomy on radiological and molecular parameters of peri-implant crestal bone loss: a randomized, controlled, split-mouth trial
    Tekdal, Goezde Peker
    Bostanci, Nagihan
    Belibasakis, Georgios N.
    Gurkan, Ali
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (05) : 535 - 544
  • [5] Impact of Platform Switching on Peri-Implant Bone Remodeling around Short Implants in the Posterior Region, 1-Year Results from a Split-Mouth Clinical Trial
    Telleman, Gerdien
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    Vissink, Arjan
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (01) : 70 - 80
  • [6] Do repeated changes of abutments have any influence on the stability of peri-implant tissues? One-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Esposito, Marco
    Bressan, Eriberto
    Grusovin, Maria Gabriella
    D'Avenia, Ferdinando
    Neumann, Konrad
    Sbricoli, Luca
    Luongo, Giuseppe
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2017, 10 (01) : 57 - 72
  • [7] Comparison of Sub-epithelial Connective Tissue Graft and Platelet Rich Fibrin in Peri-implant Soft Tissue Augmentation: A Randomized Clinical Split-mouth Study
    Elkashty, Ayman Abdel-Rahim
    Aboelmaaty, Wael Mohamed
    Elmeadawy, Samah
    Elewa, Mohammed Elsaed
    Mansour, Alaa
    Ateia, Islam Mohammed
    OPEN DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2022, 16
  • [8] Domiciliary Use of Chlorhexidine vs. Postbiotic Gels in Patients with Peri-Implant Mucositis: A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial
    Butera, Andrea
    Pascadopoli, Maurizio
    Pellegrini, Matteo
    Gallo, Simone
    Zampetti, Paolo
    Cuggia, Giada
    Scribante, Andrea
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [9] Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand method: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial
    Aydemir, Ceyda Aktolun
    Arisan, Volkan
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2020, 31 (03) : 255 - 263
  • [10] Quantitative evaluation of connective tissue grafts on peri-implant tissue morphology in the esthetic zone: A 1-year prospective clinical study
    Kobayashi, Tomoyuki
    Nakano, Tamaki
    Ono, Shinji
    Matsumura, Atsushi
    Yamada, Shuhei
    Yatani, Hirofumi
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (03) : 311 - 318