Classifying Twitter Topic-Networks Using Social Network Analysis

被引:170
作者
Himelboim, Itai [1 ,2 ]
Smith, Marc A. [4 ]
Rainie, Lee [5 ]
Shneiderman, Ben [6 ]
Espina, Camila [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Advertising, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Social Media Engagement & Evaluat Lab, SEE Suite, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Mass Commun, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[4] Connected Act Consulting Grp, Redwood City, CA USA
[5] Pew Res Ctr, Internet Sci & Technol Res, Washington, DC USA
[6] Univ Maryland, Comp Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
来源
SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY | 2017年 / 3卷 / 01期
关键词
Twitter; social media; information flow; social network analytics; network structure; SMALL-WORLD; CULTURAL-DIFFUSION; CENTRALITY; COMMUNITY; FEATHER; BIRDS;
D O I
10.1177/2056305117691545
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
As users interact via social media spaces, like Twitter, they form connections that emerge into complex social network structures. These connections are indicators of content sharing, and network structures reflect patterns of information flow. This article proposes a conceptual and practical model for the classification of topical Twitter networks, based on their network-level structures. As current literature focuses on the classification of users to key positions, this study utilizes the overall network structures in order to classify Twitter conversation based on their patterns of information flow. Four network-level metrics, which have established as indicators of information flow characteristics-density, modularity, centralization, and the fraction of isolated users-are utilized in a three-step classification model. This process led us to suggest six structures of information flow: divided, unified, fragmented, clustered, in and out hub-and-spoke networks. We demonstrate the value of these network structures by segmenting 60 Twitter topical social media network datasets into these six distinct patterns of collective connections, illustrating how different topics of conversations exhibit different patterns of information flow. We discuss conceptual and practical implications for each structure.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Adamic LA, 2005, P 3 INT WORKSH LINK, P36
[2]   The structural effects of sharing function on Twitter networks: Focusing on the retweet function [J].
Ahn, Hyerim ;
Park, Ji-Hong .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2015, 41 (03) :354-365
[3]  
Almack JC, 1922, SCHOOL SOC, V16, P529
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital
[5]  
[Anonymous], P 10 ANN INT C DIG G
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Citizens, Politics and Social Communications: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2007, J SOC STRUCT, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00050-7
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Small worlds: The dynamics of networks between order and randomness
[9]  
[Anonymous], STRUCTURE ON LINE CO
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ICWSM