Examining Bridges in Mathematics and Differential Effects Among English Language Learners

被引:2
作者
Hall, Garret J. [1 ]
Schaefer, Patti [2 ]
Hedges, Teri [2 ]
Grodsky, Eric [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Dept Educ Psychol & Learning, 1114 W Call St,3204H Stone Bldg, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Madison Metropolitan Sch Dist, Madison, WI USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Sociol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Educ Policy Studies, Madison, WI USA
关键词
elementary school; mathematics; English language learners; differences-in-differences; STUDENTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/2372966X.2020.1871304
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
IMPACT STATEMENT We used a quasi-experimental design to investigate the effect of the Bridges in Mathematics curriculum on student mathematics achievement gains in fifth grade in a large, urban school district. Students who received the curriculum grew measurably more on mathematics scores from the fall to spring of fifth grade than students who received the previous curriculum. English language learners with heterogenous English language proficiency levels and English-proficient peers benefited similarly from the curriculum. Determining the effectiveness of core mathematics curricula is foundational to evidence-based practice. Examining effectiveness heterogeneity is also crucial to better understanding mathematics achievement among English language learners (ELLs). In this study, we used a quasi-experimental design (difference-in-differences) to examine the impact of a standards-based elementary mathematics curriculum (Bridges in Mathematics) on fifth graders' annual gains in mathematics achievement in a large midwestern school district compared to the district's prior curriculum (Investigations). We also investigated whether the effect of Bridges varied across English language proficiency (ELP) levels of ELLs. Students in schools that implemented Bridges (n = 1,839) showed significantly greater mathematics gains compared to those receiving the prior curriculum (n = 3,354; g = 0.25 in change score standard deviations). This effect did not vary significantly across ELP levels. Limitations of this study as well as implications for research and practice with core curricula are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:392 / 405
页数:14
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Agodini R., 2010, Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, V3, P199, DOI 10.1080/19345741003770693
[2]  
Anderson R.C., 1981, COMPREHENSION TEACHI, P77, DOI DOI 10.4236/PSYCH.2012.31007
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Foundations for success: Final Report
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, An evaluation of the effectiveness of bridges in mathematics for developing student math skills
[5]   Persistence and Fade-Out of Educational-Intervention Effects: Mechanisms and Potential Solutions [J].
Bailey, Drew H. ;
Duncan, Greg J. ;
Cunha, Flavio ;
Foorman, Barbara R. ;
Yeager, David S. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, 2020, 21 (02) :55-97
[6]  
Baker S., 2014, IES Practice Guide. NCEE 2014-4012. What Works Clearinghouse. (NCEE 2014-4012)
[7]  
Blank K., 2009, Effects of teacher professional development on gains in student achievement: How meta analysis provides scientific evidence useful to educational leaders
[8]   Fractions: Could they really be the gatekeeper's doorman? [J].
Booth, Julie L. ;
Newton, Kristie J. .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 37 (04) :247-253
[9]  
Borman D., 2016, 20164010 NCEE
[10]  
Borman G.D., 2009, Handbook of education policy research, P129