The views of non-medical prescribing students and medical mentors on interprofessional competency assessment - A qualitative exploration

被引:4
作者
Afseth, Janyne D. [1 ]
Paterson, Ruth E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Care, Sighthill Campus, Edinburgh EH11 4BN, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Nursing; Non-medical prescribing; Designated medical practitioners; Interprofessional education; Competencies; CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; NURSE PRESCRIBERS; EDUCATION; HEALTH; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.nedt.2017.02.022
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: The United Kingdom (UK) is one of the least restrictive countries in terms of scope of prescribing practice for non-medical prescribers and is a rapidly expanding group of professionals. In the United Kingdom nurse prescribers are assessed in practice by Designated Medical Practitioners (DMP) (doctors) which is a unique approach. In light of proposals to permit nurses to assess each other the benefits and challenges associated with current approach to interprofessional assessment warranted further exploration. Objective: The aim was to explore interprofessional competency assessment with nurse non-medical prescribing students and their DMPs. Design: A descriptive qualitative research design was undertaken using semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Setting: The study was completed in a Scottish University that provides non-medical prescribing education to nurses, midwives and allied health professionals. Participants and methods: Students (n = 6) participated in two focus groups at the start and end of their supervised learning and assessment in practice. DMPs (n = 6) participated in semi structured telephone interviews on completion of supervision. Utilising Clark's theory of interprofessional education, a thematic analysis was conducted. Findings: Professional identity influenced interpretation of prescribing competence with regards assessment and scope of practice. Students and DMPs learned with, from and about each other, and provided a platform for twoway learning and mutual professional respect. The interprofessional learning experience developed relationships and provided ratification for the prescribing role post qualification. Conclusions: Further exploration with key stakeholders and service users is recommended, prior to any changes to the designated professional group assigned to assessing non-medical prescribing competence. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 108
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Evaluating the learning experience of non medical prescribing students with their designated medical practitioners in their period of learning in practice: Results of a survey [J].
Ahuja, Jaya .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2009, 29 (08) :879-885
[2]  
Avery A., 2004, Prescriber, V15, P56
[3]   Assessing the contribution of prescribing in primary care by nurses and professionals allied to medicine: a systematic review of literature [J].
Bhanbhro, Sadiq ;
Drennan, Vari M. ;
Grant, Robert ;
Harris, Ruth .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2011, 11
[4]   Nurse prescribing: Reflections on safety in practice [J].
Bradley, Eleanor ;
Hynam, Brian ;
Nolan, Peter .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2007, 65 (03) :599-609
[5]  
Braun V, 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[6]  
Clark Phillip G, 2006, J Interprof Care, V20, P577, DOI 10.1080/13561820600916717
[7]   Independent extended supplementary nurse prescribers, their prescribing practice and confidence to educate and assess prescribing students [J].
Courtenay, Molly ;
Carey, Nicola ;
Burke, Joanna .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2007, 27 (07) :739-747
[8]  
Creedon Rena, 2009, Br J Nurs, V18, P1322
[9]  
Forward J., 2005, NURSE PRESCR, V3, P204
[10]  
General Medical Council, 2021, Good practice in prescribing and managing medicines and devices