Investigation of Uncertainty Changes in Model Outputs for Finite-Element Model Updating Using Structural Health Monitoring Data

被引:31
作者
Erdogan, Yildirim Serhat [1 ]
Gul, Mustafa [2 ]
Catbas, F. Necati [3 ]
Bakir, Pelin Gundes [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 2W2, Canada
[3] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Civil Environm & Construct Engn, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
关键词
Finite element; Updating; Calibration; Monitoring; Fuzzy; Uncertainty; Optimization; Gaussian; Dynamics; Modal analysis; Structural health monitoring; DAMAGE DETECTION; QUANTIFICATION; REGULARIZATION; IDENTIFICATION; OPTIMIZATION; SENSITIVITY; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001002
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This article aims to investigate the effect of uncertainties on the predicted response of structures using updated finite-element models (FEMs). Modeling uncertainties are quantified by fuzzy numbers and are incorporated into the fuzzy FEM updating procedure. The impact of the amount and types of data used on the performance of the updated model is investigated. In order to perform the complex FEM updating calculations, which generally take too much time for complex models, a Gaussian process (GP) is used as a surrogate model. The central composite design (CCD) method is used to sample the input parameter space for more accurate GP models. Genetic algorithms (GA) are employed to solve the inverse fuzzy model updating problem. Additional constraints are presented to capture the variation space of the uncertain response parameters. The University of Central Florida benchmark test structure, which is designed to represent short-span to medium-span bridges, is used in the scope of uncertainty quantification study. Static and dynamic experimental test data obtained from the benchmark structure under different loadings and conditions are used for the demonstration. A damage case, in which the stiffness reduction in boundaries is simulated by using flexible pads, is considered. The results show that appropriate data sets, which contain the least uncertainty, should be generated instead of involving the entire set of measurements obtained from different tests. Nevertheless, uncertainty quantification should be employed to find the variation range of uncertain responses predicted by simplified FEM models. (C) 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Random matrix eigenvalue problems in structural dynamics [J].
Adhikari, S. ;
Friswell, M. I. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2007, 69 (03) :562-591
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, APPL FUZZY ARITHMETI
[3]  
[Anonymous], SMART MAT STRUCTURES
[4]   Quantification of Model Uncertainty: Calibration, Model Discrepancy, and Identifiability [J].
Arendt, Paul D. ;
Apley, Daniel W. ;
Chen, Wei .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2012, 134 (10)
[5]  
ASME, 2006, GUID VER VAL COMP SO
[6]   An improved finite element model updating method by the global optimization technique 'Coupled Local Minimizers' [J].
Bakir, Pelin Gundes ;
Reynders, Edwin ;
De Roeck, Guido .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2008, 86 (11-12) :1339-1352
[7]   Sensitivity-based finite element model updating using constrained optimization with a trust region algorithm [J].
Bakir, Pelin Gundes ;
Reynders, Edwin ;
De Roeck, Guido .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2007, 305 (1-2) :211-225
[8]   Automation of the stabilization diagrams for subspace based system identification [J].
Bakir, Pelin Gundes .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (12) :14390-14397
[9]   Updating models and their uncertainties. I: Bayesian statistical framework [J].
Beck, JL ;
Katafygiotis, LS .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 1998, 124 (04) :455-461
[10]   Model selection using response measurements: Bayesian probabilistic approach [J].
Beck, JL ;
Yuen, KV .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 2004, 130 (02) :192-203