The Precalculus Concept Assessment: A Tool for Assessing Students' Reasoning Abilities and Understandings

被引:68
作者
Carlson, Marilyn [1 ]
Oehrtman, Michael [1 ]
Engelke, Nicole [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
KNOWLEDGE; DESIGN; TASKS;
D O I
10.1080/07370001003676587
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This article describes the development of the Precalculus Concept Assessment (PCA) instrument, a 25-item multiple-choice exam. The reasoning abilities and understandings central to precalculus and foundational for beginning calculus were identified and characterized in a series of research studies and are articulated in the PCA Taxonomy. These include a strong understanding of ideas of rate of change and function, a process view of function, and the ability to use covariational reasoning to examine and represent how two covarying quantities change together. This taxonomy guided the PCA development and now provides the theoretical basis for interpreting and reporting PCA results. A critical element of PCA's design was to identify the constructs essential for learning calculus and to employ methods to assure that PCA items are effective in assessing these constructs. We illustrate the role that cognitive research played during both the design and validation phases of the PCA instrument. We also describe our Four-Phase Instrument Development Framework that articulates the methods used to create and validate PCA. This framework should also be useful for others interested in developing similar instruments in other content areas. The uses of PCA are described and include (a) assessing student learning in college algebra and precalculus, (b) comparing the effectiveness of various curricular treatments, and (c) determining student readiness for calculus.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 145
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy
[2]  
[Anonymous], AM IMP TRANSF RECR R
[3]  
ARISMENDIPARDI EJ, 1996, DEV REVISED COURSE O
[4]  
Breidenbach D., 1992, Educational Studies in Mathematics, V5, P123, DOI 10.1007/BF02309532
[5]  
BRIDGEMAN B, 1989, 899 COLL ENTR EX BOA
[6]   Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study [J].
Carlson, M ;
Jacobs, S ;
Coe, E ;
Larsen, S ;
Hsu, E .
JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2002, 33 (05) :352-378
[7]  
Carlson M, 2003, BEYOND CONSTRUCTIVISM: MODELS AND MODELING PERSPECTIVES ON MATHEMATICS PROBLEM SOLVING, LEARNING AND TEACHING, P465
[8]  
CARLSON M, 2004, MAA NOTES ONLINE PRO
[9]  
CARLSON M, 1995, THESIS U KANSAS LAWR
[10]  
CARLSON M, 1997, AM MATH ASS 2 YEAR C, P48