Mediated phonological-semantic priming in spoken word production: Evidence for cascaded processing from picture-word interference

被引:3
作者
Mascelloni, Matteo [1 ]
McMahon, Katie L. [1 ,2 ]
Piai, Vitoria [3 ,4 ]
Kleinman, Daniel [5 ]
de Zubicaray, Greig [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Fac Hlth, Sch Psychol & Counselling, Victoria Pk Rd, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Fac Hlth, Sch Clin Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Ctr Cognit, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Ctr Med Neurosci, Dept Med Psychol, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Haskins Labs Inc, New Haven, CT USA
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Speech production; semantic interference; PWI; mediated semantic priming; LANGUAGE PRODUCTION; LEXICAL ACCESS; SPEECH PRODUCTION; TIME-COURSE; TEMPORAL SIGNATURES; ACTIVATION; FACILITATION; SELECTION; ERROR;
D O I
10.1177/17470218211010591
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The cognitive architecture that allows humans to retrieve words from the mental lexicon has been investigated for decades. While there is consensus regarding a two-step architecture involving lexical-conceptual and phonological word-form levels of processing, accounts of how activation spreads between them (e.g., in a serial, cascaded, or interactive fashion) remain contentious. In addition, production models differ with respect to whether selection occurs at lexical or postlexical levels. The purpose of this study was to examine whether mediated phonological-semantic relations (e.g., drip is phonologically related to drill that is semantically related to hammer) influence production in adults as predicted by models implementing cascaded processing and feedback between levels. Two experiments using the picture-word interference (PWI) paradigm were conducted using auditory (Exp. 1) and written (Exp. 2) distractors. We hypothesised that a mediated semantic interference effect would be observable in the former with the involvement of both spoken word production and recognition, and in the latter if lexical representations are shared between written and spoken words in English, as assumed by some production accounts. Furthermore, we hypothesised a mediated semantic interference effect would be inconsistent with a postlexical selection account as the distractors do not constitute a relevant response for the target picture (e.g., drip-HAMMER). We observed mediated semantic interference only from auditory distractors, while observing the standard semantic interference effect from both auditory and written distractors. The current findings represent the first chronometric evidence involving spoken word production and recognition in support of cascaded processing during lexical retrieval in adults and present a significant challenge for the postlexical selection account.
引用
收藏
页码:1284 / 1294
页数:11
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   MultiPic: A standardized set of 750 drawings with norms for six European languages [J].
Andoni Dunabeitia, Jon ;
Crepaldi, Davide ;
Meyer, Antje S. ;
New, Boris ;
Pliatsikas, Christos ;
Smolka, Eva ;
Brysbaert, Marc .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 71 (04) :808-816
[2]  
Audacity Team, AUD R FREE AUD ED RE
[3]   The English Lexicon Project [J].
Balota, David A. ;
Yap, Melvin J. ;
Cortese, Michael J. ;
Hutchison, Keith A. ;
Kessler, Brett ;
Loftis, Bjorn ;
Neely, James H. ;
Nelson, Douglas L. ;
Simpson, Greg B. ;
Treiman, Rebecca .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (03) :445-459
[4]  
Bates D., 2015, ARXIV E PRINT REVIS
[5]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[6]  
BERG T, 1992, J PSYCHOLINGUIST RES, V21, P405
[7]   What did we learn from forty years of research on semantic interference? A Bayesian meta-analysis [J].
Burki, Audrey ;
Elbuy, Shereen ;
Madec, Sylvain ;
Vasishth, Shravan .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2020, 114
[8]   THE STRUCTURE OF GRAPHEMIC REPRESENTATIONS [J].
CARAMAZZA, A ;
MICELI, G .
COGNITION, 1990, 37 (03) :243-297
[9]   How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? [J].
Caramazza, A .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 14 (01) :177-208
[10]   The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: does the response set matter? [J].
Caramazza, A ;
Costa, A .
COGNITION, 2000, 75 (02) :B51-B64