Optimal allocation of regional water resources: From a perspective of equity-efficiency tradeoff

被引:115
|
作者
Hu, Zhineng [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Yazhen [2 ]
Yao, Liming [1 ,2 ]
Wei, Changting [2 ]
Li, Chaozhi [3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, State Key Lab Hydraul & Mt River Engn, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Uncertainty Decis Making Lab, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China
[3] Neijiang Survey & Design Inst Water Conservancy &, Neijiang 641000, Peoples R China
关键词
Water allocation; Equity; Efficiency; Trade-off; Conflict; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; PROGRAMMING MODEL; MANAGEMENT; OPTIMIZATION; SCARCITY; MARKETS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.02.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Because of the significant impact on economic development, social stability, and ecological balance, the allocation of water resources has become an issue of worldwide concern. Therefore, the efficient, equitable, and sustainable allocation of water is vital for water management authorities. With sustainability (guaranteeing the minimum ecological water needs) as the constraint, the paper aims to enhance the water management by considering equity and efficiency. A multi-objective programming model is built with the first objective being to maximize the economic benefit efficiency to allow for the development of improved water allocation strategies and with the second objective being to maximize water allocation equity (measured using the Gini coefficient). A Compromise Programming (CP) method is employed to trade off economic benefit efficiency and equity in the water allocation, which can provide relatively flexible choices and trade-offs according to the decision makers' preferences. The presented model is applied to the Qujiang river basin in China as a case study to demonstrate its feasibility, validity, and practicality, the results from which indicate the trade-off between equity and economic benefit efficiency in the model was feasible, and the conclusions are that river basin authorities need to take measures to decrease the rate of water loss and increase the available water to enhance water allocation efficiency and equity. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 113
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of carbon allocation schemes: On the equity-efficiency tradeoff
    Pan, Xunzhang
    Teng, Fei
    Wang, Gehua
    ENERGY, 2014, 74 : 222 - 229
  • [2] THE LIMITS OF THE EQUITY-EFFICIENCY TRADEOFF
    KEENAN, DC
    RUBIN, PH
    PUBLIC CHOICE, 1985, 47 (03) : 425 - 436
  • [3] Revisiting the equity-efficiency tradeoff
    Jackson, Randall
    REGIONAL SCIENCE POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2011, 3 (04): : 421 - 425
  • [4] The equity-efficiency tradeoff: What is the social interpretation of equity?
    Pickee, S
    Ament, A
    Stolk, S
    Busschbach, J
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2002, 5 (06) : 448 - 448
  • [5] Income inequality and economic incentives: Is there an equity-efficiency tradeoff?
    Stevans, Lonnie K.
    RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS, 2012, 66 (02) : 149 - 160
  • [6] Initial Allocation Model of CO2 Emission Allowances Based on the Equity-Efficiency Tradeoff
    Chen Liyun
    He Yuan
    Li Guang
    Li Caixia
    Ren Jiqin
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 38 (02)
  • [7] Exploring the geographical equity-efficiency tradeoff in cycling infrastructure planning
    Bonsma-Fisher, Madeleine
    Lin, Bo
    Chan, Timothy C. Y.
    Saxe, Shoshanna
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2024, 121
  • [8] FinTech and capital allocation efficiency: Another equity-efficiency dilemma?
    Xie, Xueyan
    Zhu, Xiaoyang
    GLOBAL FINANCE JOURNAL, 2022, 53
  • [9] INCOME-TAX EVASION, LABOR SUPPLY, AND THE EQUITY-EFFICIENCY TRADEOFF
    SANDMO, A
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1981, 16 (03) : 265 - 288
  • [10] What Is the Equity-Efficiency Tradeoff When Maintaining Wells in Rural Haiti?
    Aliprantis, Dionissi
    WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2018, 32 (02): : 482 - 504