ER-Negative Breast Cancer Is Highly Responsive to Cholesterol Metabolite Signalling

被引:11
|
作者
Hutchinson, Samantha A. [1 ]
Lianto, Priscilia [1 ]
Roberg-Larsen, Hanne [2 ]
Battaglia, Sebastiano [3 ]
Hughes, Thomas A. [4 ]
Thorne, James L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Food Sci & Nutr, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Oslo, Dept Chem, N-0315 Oslo, Norway
[3] Roswell Park Canc Inst, Ctr Immunotherapy, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[4] Univ Leeds, Sch Med, Leeds LS9 7TF, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
cholesterol; hydroxycholesterol; breast cancer; LXR; oestrogen receptor status; corepressors; ELEVATED NCOR1 DISRUPTS; NUCLEAR RECEPTOR LXR; PROSTATE-CANCER; GENE; 27-HYDROXYCHOLESTEROL; ASSOCIATION; EXPRESSION; LIGANDS; CELLS; RISK;
D O I
10.3390/nu11112618
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Interventions that alter cholesterol have differential impacts on hormone receptor positive- and negative-breast cancer risk and prognosis. This implies differential regulation or response to cholesterol within different breast cancer subtypes. We evaluated differences in side-chain hydroxycholesterol and liver X nuclear receptor signalling between Oestrogen Receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative breast cancers and cell lines. Cell line models of ER-positive and ER-negative disease were treated with Liver X Receptor (LXR) ligands and transcriptional activity assessed using luciferase reporters, qPCR and MTT. Publicly available datasets were mined to identify differences between ER-negative and ER-positive tumours and siRNA was used to suppress candidate regulators. Compared to ER-positive breast cancer, ER-negative breast cancer cells were highly responsive to LXR agonists. In primary disease and cell lines LXRA expression was strongly correlated with its target genes in ER-negative but not ER-positive disease. Expression of LXR's corepressors (NCOR1, NCOR2 and LCOR) was significantly higher in ER-positive disease relative to ER-negative, and their knock-down equalized sensitivity to ligand between subtypes in reporter, gene expression and viability assays. Our data support further evaluation of dietary and pharmacological targeting of cholesterol metabolism as an adjunct to existing therapies for ER-negative and ER-positive breast cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Identification of key genes relevant to the prognosis of ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer based on a prognostic prediction system
    Bin Xiao
    Jianfeng Hang
    Ting Lei
    Yongyin He
    Zhenzhan Kuang
    Li Wang
    Lidan Chen
    Jia He
    Weiyun Zhang
    Yang Liao
    Zhaohui Sun
    Linhai Li
    Molecular Biology Reports, 2019, 46 : 2111 - 2119
  • [42] Inhibition of the p38 Kinase Suppresses the Proliferation of Human ER-Negative Breast Cancer Cells
    Chen, Lu
    Mayer, Julie Ann
    Krisko, Tibor I.
    Speers, Corey W.
    Wang, Tao
    Hilsenbeck, Susan G.
    Brown, Powel H.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 69 (23) : 8853 - 8861
  • [43] A robust classifier of high predictive value to identify good prognosis patients in ER-negative breast cancer
    Andrew E Teschendorff
    Carlos Caldas
    Breast Cancer Research, 10
  • [44] Inherited variants in the inner centromere protein (INCENP) gene of the chromosomal passenger complex contribute to the susceptibility of ER-negative breast cancer
    Kabisch, Maria
    Bermejo, Justo Lorenzo
    Duennebier, Thomas
    Ying, Shibo
    Michailidou, Kyriaki
    Bolla, Manjeet K.
    Wang, Qin
    Dennis, Joe
    Shah, Mitul
    Perkins, Barbara J.
    Czene, Kamila
    Darabi, Hatef
    Eriksson, Mikael
    Bojesen, Stig E.
    Nordestgaard, Borge G.
    Nielsen, Sune F.
    Flyger, Henrik
    Lambrechts, Diether
    Neven, Patrick
    Peeters, Stephanie
    Weltens, Caroline
    Couch, Fergus J.
    Olson, Janet E.
    Wang, Xianshu
    Purrington, Kristen
    Chang-Claude, Jenny
    Rudolph, Anja
    Seibold, Petra
    Flesch-Janys, Dieter
    Peto, Julian
    dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel
    Johnson, Nichola
    Fletcher, Olivia
    Nevanlinna, Heli
    Muranen, Taru A.
    Aittomaki, Kristiina
    Blomqvist, Carl
    Schmidt, Marjanka K.
    Broeks, Annegien
    Cornelissen, Sten
    Hogervorst, Frans B. L.
    Li, Jingmei
    Brand, Judith S.
    Humphreys, Keith
    Guenel, Pascal
    Truong, Therese
    Menegaux, Florence
    Sanchez, Marie
    Burwinkel, Barbara
    Marme, Frederik
    CARCINOGENESIS, 2015, 36 (02) : 256 - 271
  • [45] Radiation Therapy Use and Outcomes Among Older Women With ER-Positive and ER-Negative Stage I Breast Cancer
    Shen, Xinglei
    Anne, Pramila R.
    Keith, Scott W.
    Wojcieszynski, Andrzej
    Mishra, Mark V.
    Bar-Ad, Voichita
    Showalter, Timothy N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2014, 37 (03): : 241 - 247
  • [46] Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) expression is associated with poor outcome in ER-negative, but not ER-positive, breast cancer
    Witton, CJ
    Hawe, SJK
    Cooke, TG
    Bartlett, JMS
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2004, 45 (01) : 47 - 54
  • [47] Two E-selectin ligands, BST-2 and LGALS3BP, predict metastasis and poor survival of ER-negative breast cancer
    Woodman, Natalie
    Pinder, Sarah E.
    Tajadura, Virginia
    Le Bourhis, Xuefen
    Gillett, Cheryl
    Delannoy, Philippe
    Burchell, Joy M.
    Julien, Sylvain
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 49 (01) : 265 - 275
  • [48] RANK-c attenuates aggressive properties of ER-negative breast cancer by inhibiting NF-κB activation and EGFR signaling
    Sirinian, Chaido
    Papanastasiou, Anastasios D.
    Schizas, Michail
    Spella, Magda
    Stathopoulos, Georgios T.
    Repanti, Maria
    Zarkadis, Ioannis K.
    King, Tari A.
    Kalofonos, Haralabos P.
    ONCOGENE, 2018, 37 (37) : 5101 - 5114
  • [49] ER Re-expression and Re-sensitization to Endocrine Therapies in ER-negative Breast Cancers
    Joeli A. Brinkman
    Dorraya El-Ashry
    Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, 2009, 14 : 67 - 78
  • [50] CXCR4 signaling identifies a role for IFT2 in ER-negative breast cancers
    Brody, Jonathan R.
    Witkiewicz, Agnieszka K.
    CANCER BIOLOGY & THERAPY, 2010, 10 (06) : 615 - 616