Air-Abrasive Disinfection of Implant Surfaces in a Simulated Model of Periimplantitis

被引:28
作者
Quintero, David George [1 ]
Taylor, Robert Bonnie [2 ]
Miller, Matthew Braden [1 ]
Merchant, Keith Roshanali [3 ]
Pasieta, Scott Anthony [4 ]
机构
[1] Walter Reed Natl Mil Med Ctr, Naval Postgrad Dent Sch, Periodont, Bethesda, MD USA
[2] Walter Reed Natl Mil Med Ctr, Dept Res Programs, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] Naval Med Ctr Periodontal Clin, Portsmouth, VA USA
[4] 21st Dent Co, Branch Dent Clin, Kaneohe Bay, HI USA
关键词
air-powder; abrasion; decontamination; defect; 14-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; PERI-IMPLANTITIS; RE-OSSEOINTEGRATION; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; BONE LOSS; PREVALENCE; DISEASES; LESIONS; DECONTAMINATION; MICROBIOTA;
D O I
10.1097/ID.0000000000000597
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the ability of air-powder abrasion to decontaminate dental implants. Materials and Methods: Twenty-six implants were inoculated with a Streptococcus sanguinis biofilm media in a novel periimplantitis defect model. Six implants served as controls, and 20 implants were disinfected with either the Cavitron JET Plus or the AIR-FLOW PERIO air-powder abrasion units. Residual bacteria were cultured, and colony forming units (CFUs) were totaled at 24 hours. Results: As expected, negative control implant cultures showed no evidence of viable bacteria. Bacterial growth was observed on all positive control cultures, whereas only 15% of the experimental cultures displayed evidence of viable bacteria. The average CFU per streak for the positive control was 104 compared with a maximum of 10 and 4 CFUs for the Cavitron JET Plus and AIR-FLOW PERIO, respectively. There was a 99.9% reduction in bacteria for both air-powder abrasion instruments. Conclusion: Air-powder abrasion is an effective technique for the decontamination of dental implants, and the Cavitron JET Plus and AIR-FLOW PERIO are equally successful at eliminating viable bacteria from implant surfaces.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 428
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
American Academy of Implant Dentistry, DENT IMPL FACTS FIG
[2]  
[Anonymous], AM AC PER GLOSS TERM
[3]   Subgingival microbiota in peri-implant mucosa lesions and adjacent teeth in partially edentulous patients [J].
Botero, JE ;
González, AM ;
Mercado, RA ;
Olave, G ;
Contreras, A .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2005, 76 (09) :1490-1495
[4]   Long-term implant success at the Academy for Oral Implantology: 8-year follow-up and risk factor analysis [J].
Busenlechner, Dieter ;
Fuerhauser, Rudolf ;
Haas, Robert ;
Watzek, Georg ;
Mailath, Georg ;
Pommer, Bernhard .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL AND IMPLANT SCIENCE, 2014, 44 (03) :102-108
[5]   CONTAMINATED IMPLANT SURFACES - AN IN-VITRO COMPARISON OF IMPLANT SURFACE COATING AND TREATMENT MODALITIES FOR DECONTAMINATION [J].
DENNISON, DK ;
HUERZELER, MB ;
QUINONES, C ;
CAFFESSE, RG .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1994, 65 (10) :942-948
[6]  
Dentsply Professional, 2010, CAV JET PLUS ULTR SC
[7]  
Duarte PM, 2009, J PERIODONTOL, V80, P234, DOI [10.1902/jop.2009.070672, 10.1902/jop.2009.070672 ]
[8]  
Electro Medical Systems, 2011, AIR FLOW HAND 2 AIR
[9]   Prevalence of subjects with progressive bone loss at implants [J].
Fransson, C ;
Lekholm, U ;
Jemt, T ;
Berglundh, T .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2005, 16 (04) :440-446
[10]  
Froum SJ, 2012, INT J PERIODONT REST, V32, P11