CT-Colonography vs. Colonoscopy for Detection of High-Risk Sessile Serrated Polyps

被引:70
|
作者
IJspeert, J. E. G. [1 ]
Nolthenius, C. J. Tutein [2 ]
Kuipers, E. J. [3 ]
van Leerdam, M. E. [4 ]
Nio, C. Y. [2 ]
Thomeer, M. G. J. [5 ]
Biermann, K. [6 ]
van de Vijver, M. J. [7 ]
Dekker, E. [1 ]
Stoker, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[7] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
SOCIETY-TASK-FORCE; COLORECTAL-CANCER; SURVEILLANCE; POLYPECTOMY; CLASSIFICATION; PREVALENCE; NEOPLASIA; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1038/ajg.2016.58
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) are suggested to be the precursors of 15-30% of all colorectal cancers (CRCs). Therefore, CRC screening modalities should also be designed to detect high-risk SSPs. We compared computed tomography colonography (CTC) with colonoscopy-based screening for the detection of high-risk SSPs in average-risk individuals. METHODS: Data from a randomized controlled trial that compared CTC with colonoscopy for population screening were used for the analysis. Individuals diagnosed at CTC with a lesion >= 10 mm in size were referred for colonoscopy. Individuals with only 6-9 mm lesions were offered surveillance CTC. This surveillance CTC was followed by a colonoscopy when a lesion >= 6 mm was detected. Yield of both was accumulated to mimic current American College of Radiology CTC referral strategy (referral of individuals with any lesion >= 6 mm). Per participant detection of >= 1 high-risk (dysplastic and/or = 10 mm) SSP was compared with colonoscopy using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In total, 8,844 individuals were invited to participate (in 2: 1 allocation), of which 1,276 colonoscopy and 982 CTC invitees participated in the study. In the colonoscopy arm, 4.3% of individuals were diagnosed with >= 1 high-risk SSP, compared with 0.8% in the CTC arm (odds ratio (OR) 5.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6-11.6; P<0.001). In total, 3.1% of individuals in the colonoscopy arm were diagnosed with high-risk SSPs as most advanced lesion, compared with 0.4% in the CTC arm (OR 7.7; 95% CI 2.7-21.6; P<0.001). The current CTC strategy showed a marked lower detection for especially fl at high-risk SSPs (17 vs. 0), high-risk SSP located in the proximal colon (32 vs. 1), and SSPs with dysplasia (30 vs. 1). CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized controlled setting, the detection rate of high-risk SSPs was significantly higher with colonoscopy than CTC. These results might have implications for CTC as a CRC modality for opportunistic screening in average-risk adults.
引用
收藏
页码:516 / 522
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cold EMR vs. Hot EMR for the removal of sessile serrated polyps larger than 10 mm: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ding, Cong
    Yang, Jian-feng
    Wang, Xia
    Zhou, Yi-feng
    Khizar, Hayat
    Jin, Zheng
    Zhang, Xiao-feng
    BMC SURGERY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [22] Comparison of CT colonography vs. conventional colonoscopy in mapping the segmental location of colon cancer before surgery
    Neri, Emanuele
    Turini, Francesca
    Cerri, Francesca
    Faggioni, Lorenzo
    Vagli, Paola
    Naldini, Gabriele
    Bartolozzi, Carlo
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2010, 35 (05): : 589 - 595
  • [23] Proposal of high-risk adenoma detection rate as an impactful, complementary quality indicator of colonoscopy
    Wadhwa, Vaibhav
    Jobanputra, Yash
    Al Taii, Haider
    Thota, Prashanthi N.
    Lopez, Rocio
    Gurudu, Suryakanth R.
    Sanaka, Madhusudhan R.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (01): : 325 - 331
  • [24] Estimation of Impact of American College of Radiology Recommendations on CT Colonography Reporting for Resection of High-Risk Adenoma Findings
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Overhiser, Andrew J.
    Chen, Shawn C.
    Cummings, Oscar W.
    Ulbright, Thomas M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 104 (01) : 149 - 153
  • [25] Colon Capsule Endoscopy vs. CT Colonography Following Incomplete Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
    Deding, Ulrik
    Kaalby, Lasse
    Boggild, Henrik
    Plantener, Eva
    Wollesen, Mie Kruse
    Kobaek-Larsen, Morten
    Hansen, Siri Juul
    Baatrup, Gunnar
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (11) : 1 - 17
  • [26] Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population
    Graser, A.
    Stieber, P.
    Nagel, D.
    Schaefer, C.
    Horst, D.
    Becker, C. R.
    Nikolaou, K.
    Lottes, A.
    Geisbuesch, S.
    Kramer, H.
    Wagner, A. C.
    Diepolder, H.
    Schirra, J.
    Roth, H. J.
    Seidel, D.
    Goeke, B.
    Reiser, M. F.
    Kolligs, F. T.
    GUT, 2009, 58 (02) : 241 - 248
  • [27] Use of surveillance colonoscopy among individuals with removal of high-risk polyps according to the US Multi-Society Task Force recommendations
    Knudsen, Markus D.
    Wang, Kai
    Berstad, Paula
    Polychronidis, Georgios
    Vithayahil, Mathew
    Song, Mingyang
    CANCER, 2023, 129 (09) : 1394 - 1401
  • [28] Smoking and Other Risk Factors in Individuals With Synchronous Conventional High-Risk Adenomas and Clinically Significant Serrated Polyps
    Anderson, Joseph C.
    Calderwood, Audrey H.
    Christensen, Brock C.
    Robinson, Christina M.
    Amos, Christopher I.
    Butterly, Lynn
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 113 (12) : 1828 - 1835
  • [29] CT colonography after incomplete optical colonoscopy: bowel preparation quality at same-day vs. deferred examination
    Theis, Jake
    Kim, David H.
    Lubner, Meghan G.
    del Rio, Alejandro Munoz
    Pickhardt, Perry J.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 41 (01) : 10 - 18
  • [30] High-definition vs. standard-definition colonoscopy in the characterization of small colonic polyps: results from a randomized trial
    Longcroft-Wheaton, G.
    Brown, J.
    Cowlishaw, D.
    Higgins, B.
    Bhandari, P.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 44 (10) : 905 - 910