Evaluating the efficiency of industrial environmental regulation in China:A three-stage data envelopment analysis approach

被引:45
作者
Feng, Mei [1 ]
Li, Xinyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Donlinks Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental regulation; Industrial sectors; Efficiency measurement; 3-Stage DEA; POLLUTION HAVEN HYPOTHESIS; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; ECO-EFFICIENCY; KUZNETS CURVE; ENERGY; COMPETITIVENESS; PRODUCTIVITY; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118535
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental regulation is of great concern to international academics and policy makers. Previous studies often regarded environmental regulation as an influencing factor when calculating eco-efficiency or energy efficiency. More attention should be given to the efficiency of environmental regulation, especially in industrial field. According to exiting studies, industrial environmental regulation efficiency (IERE) may be influenced by external environmental factors, to explore the influence and obtain an actual efficiency, this paper calculated IERE in China by using the panel data of 30 regions from 2011 to 2015 (the 12th Five-Year Plan period) through the three-stage data envelopment analysis approach. Firstly, the Undesirable-slacks-based model method was used to calculate the original IERE. Secondly, the economic base, industrial structure, urbanization level, and education level were taken as external environmental variables, and the effect of external environmental factors and stochastic disturbance were excluded. Thirdly, the actual IERE can be calculated after adjusting input values. The results showed that China's IERE was underestimated due to the impact from external environmental factors. Moreover, the IERE was more influenced by pure technical efficiency than scale efficiency. The IERE of each region varied, thus, targeted policies should be formulated according to local conditions. This research provided a new analytical method for calculating environmental regulation efficiency. The method can be applied either in other countries or in other sectors. (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Trade from resource-rich countries avoids the existence of a global pollution haven hypothesis [J].
Antonio Lopez, Luis ;
Arce, Guadalupe ;
Kronenberg, Tobias ;
Rodrigues, Joao F. D. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 175 :599-611
[2]   Will developing countries become pollution havens for developed countries? An empirical investigation in the Belt and Road [J].
Cai, Xiang ;
Che, Xiahui ;
Zhu, Bangzhu ;
Zhao, Juan ;
Xie, Rui .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 198 :624-632
[3]  
Charnes A., 1985, ANN OPER RES, V2, P59, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01874733
[4]   Environmental awareness and environmental Kuznets curve [J].
Chen, Xudong ;
Huang, Bihong ;
Lin, Chin-Te .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2019, 77 :2-11
[5]  
[程钰 Cheng Yu], 2016, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V35, P123
[6]   NORTH-SOUTH TRADE AND THE ENVIRONMENT [J].
COPELAND, BR ;
TAYLOR, MS .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 109 (03) :755-787
[7]   How does the industry mobility affect pollution industry transfer in China: Empirical test on Pollution Haven Hypothesis and Porter Hypothesis [J].
Dou, Jianmin ;
Han, Xu .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 217 :105-115
[8]  
Du L.M., 2010, South China J. Econ, P20
[9]  
Fare R., 1996, INTERTEMPORAL PRODUC, P220
[10]   Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopment analysis [J].
Fried, HO ;
Lovell, CAK ;
Schmidt, SS ;
Yaisawarng, S .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2002, 17 (1-2) :157-174