The relationship between cultural tightness-looseness and COVID-19 cases and deaths: a global analysis

被引:319
作者
Gelfand, Michele J. [1 ]
Jackson, Joshua Conrad [4 ]
Pan, Xinyue [1 ]
Nau, Dana [2 ,3 ]
Pieper, Dylan [1 ]
Denison, Emmy [1 ]
Dagher, Munqith [5 ]
Van Lange, Paul A. M. [6 ]
Chiu, Chi-Yue [7 ]
Wang, Mo [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Psychol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Comp Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Inst Syst Res, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[5] Al Mustakilla Res Grp, Amman, Jordan
[6] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Brain & Behav, Dept Expt & Appl Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Social Sci, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[8] Univ Florida, Warrington Coll Business, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
SOCIAL NORMS; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30301-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background The COVID-19 pandemic is a global health crisis, yet certain countries have had far more success in limiting COVID-19 cases and deaths. We suggest that collective threats require a tremendous amount of coordination, and that strict adherence to social norms is a key mechanism that enables groups to do so. Here we examine how the strength of social norms-or cultural tightness-looseness-was associated with countries' success in limiting cases and deaths by October, 2020. We expected that tight cultures, which have strict norms and punishments for deviance, would have fewer cases and deaths per million as compared with loose cultures, which have weaker norms and are more permissive. Methods We estimated the relationship between cultural tightness-looseness and COVID-19 case and mortality rates as of Oct 16, 2020, using ordinary least squares regression. We fit a series of stepwise models to capture whether cultural tightness-looseness explained variation in case and death rates controlling for under-reporting, demographics, geopolitical factors, other cultural dimensions, and climate. Findings The results indicated that, compared with nations with high levels of cultural tightness, nations with high levels of cultural looseness are estimated to have had 4.99 times the number of cases (7132 per million vs 1428 per million, respectively) and 8.71 times the number of deaths (183 per million vs 21 per million, respectively), taking into account a number of controls. A formal evolutionary game theoretic model suggested that tight groups cooperate much faster under threat and have higher survival rates than loose groups. The results suggest that tightening social norms might confer an evolutionary advantage in times of collective threat. Interpretation Nations that are tight and abide by strict norms have had more success than those that are looser as of the October, 2020. New interventions are needed to help countries tighten social norms as they continue to battle COVID-19 and other collective threats. Copyright (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:e135 / e144
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] The Short-Run and Long-Run Effects of Behavioral Interventions: Experimental Evidence from Energy Conservation
    Allcott, Hunt
    Rogers, Todd
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 104 (10) : 3003 - 3037
  • [2] Humanity tested
    不详
    [J]. NATURE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 4 (04) : 355 - 356
  • [3] Mandated Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination predicts flattened curves for the spread of COVID-19
    Berg, Martha K.
    Yu, Qinggang
    Salvador, Cristina E.
    Melani, Irene
    Kitayama, Shinobu
    [J]. SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2020, 6 (32)
  • [4] Interventions Highlighting Hypocrisy Reduce Collective Blame of Muslims for Individual Acts of Violence and Assuage Anti-Muslim Hostility
    Bruneau, Emile
    Kteily, Nour
    Falk, Emily
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2018, 44 (03) : 430 - 448
  • [5] Social influence: Compliance and conformity
    Cialdini, RB
    Goldstein, NJ
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 55 : 591 - 621
  • [6] Eriksson K, NAT COMMUN
  • [7] Social Norms and Pro-environmental Behavior: A Review of the Evidence
    Farrow, Katherine
    Grolleau, Gilles
    Ibanez, Lisette
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 140 : 1 - 13
  • [8] Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe
    Flaxman, Seth
    Mishra, Swapnil
    Gandy, Axel
    Unwin, H. Juliette T.
    Mellan, Thomas A.
    Coupland, Helen
    Whittaker, Charles
    Zhu, Harrison
    Berah, Tresnia
    Eaton, Jeffrey W.
    Monod, Melodie
    Ghani, Azra C.
    Donnelly, Christl A.
    Riley, Steven
    Vollmer, Michaela A. C.
    Ferguson, Neil M.
    Okell, Lucy C.
    Bhatt, Samir
    [J]. NATURE, 2020, 584 (7820) : 257 - +
  • [9] Gelfand M., 2018, RULE MAKERS RULE BRE
  • [10] Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation Study
    Gelfand, Michele J.
    Raver, Jana L.
    Nishii, Lisa
    Leslie, Lisa M.
    Lun, Janetta
    Lim, Beng Chong
    Duan, Lili
    Almaliach, Assaf
    Ang, Soon
    Arnadottir, Jakobina
    Aycan, Zeynep
    Boehnke, Klaus
    Boski, Pawel
    Cabecinhas, Rosa
    Chan, Darius
    Chhokar, Jagdeep
    D'Amato, Alessia
    Ferrer, Montse
    Fischlmayr, Iris C.
    Fischer, Ronald
    Fueloep, Marta
    Georgas, James
    Kashima, Emiko S.
    Kashima, Yoshishima
    Kim, Kibum
    Lempereur, Alain
    Marquez, Patricia
    Othman, Rozhan
    Overlaet, Bert
    Panagiotopoulou, Penny
    Peltzer, Karl
    Perez-Florizno, Lorena R.
    Ponomarenko, Larisa
    Realo, Anu
    Schei, Vidar
    Schmitt, Manfred
    Smith, Peter B.
    Soomro, Nazar
    Szabo, Erna
    Taveesin, Nalinee
    Toyama, Midori
    Van de Vliert, Evert
    Vohra, Naharika
    Ward, Colleen
    Yamaguchi, Susumu
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2011, 332 (6033) : 1100 - 1104