R2* Relaxation Affects Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Cancer and Underestimates Treatment Response at 7 T

被引:3
作者
Kim, Jana [1 ,2 ]
Moestue, Siver A. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Bathen, Tone F. [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Eugene [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] NTNU Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med, Dept Circulat & Med Imaging, Trondheim, Norway
[2] St Olavs Hosp, Trondheim, Norway
[3] NTNU Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Lab Med Womens & Childrens Hlth, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Nord Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Pharm, Namsos, Norway
[5] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, Dept Neuroimaging, London, England
关键词
DCE-MRI; r2* correction; transverse relaxation; multi-echo; treatment monitoring; DCE-MRI; PROSTATE-CANCER; FIELD-STRENGTH; DSC-MRI; PARAMETERS; TRACER; BLOOD; T-1; PERFUSION; PERMEABILITY;
D O I
10.18383/j.tom.2019.00015
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Effective transverse relaxivity of gadolinium-based contrast agents is often neglected in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) Here, we assess time and tissue dependence of R2* enhancement and its impact on pharmacokinetic parameter quantification and treatment monitoring. Multiecho DCE-MRI was performed at 7 T on mice bearing subcutaneous TON-21G human ovarian cancer xenografts (n = 8) and on the tronsgenic adenocorcinomo of the mouse prostate (TRAMP) model (n = 7). Subsequently, the TOY-21G tumor-bearing mice were treated with bevacizumab and rescanned 2 days later, Pharmacokinetic analysis (extended Toffs model) was performed using either the first echo signal only (standard single-echo DCE-MRI) or the estimated signal at TE = 0 derived from exponential fitting of R2* relaxation (R2* corrected). Neglecting R2* enhancement causes underestimation of Gd-DOTA concentration (peak enhance meat underestimated by 9,4%-16% in TOV-21G tumors and 1 3%-20% in TRAMP prostates). Median K'r"' and v, were underestimated in every mouse (TOV-21G K-trans: 11%-19%, TOV-21G v(e): 5 3%-8.9%; TRAMP K-trans: 8.6%-19%, TRAMP v(e): 12%-21%). Bevacizumab treatment reduced K-trans in all TOV-21G tumors after 48 hours. Treatment effect was significantly greater in all tumors after R2* correction (median change of 0.050 min(-1) in R2*-corrected vs. 0.037 min(-1) in uncorrected K-trans). R2* enhancement in DOE-MRI is both time- and tissue-dependent and may not be negligible at 7 T in tissue with high. This has consequences for the use of K-trans and other DCE-MRI parameters as biomarkers, because treatment effect size can be underestimated when R2* enhancement is neglected.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 319
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Intratumor distribution and test-retest comparisons of physiological parameters quantified by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in rat U251 glioma
    Aryal, Madhava P.
    Nagaraja, Tavarekere N.
    Brown, Stephen L.
    Lu, Mei
    Bagher-Ebadian, Hassan
    Ding, Guangliang
    Panda, Swayamprava
    Keenan, Kelly
    Cabral, Glauber
    Mikkelsen, Tom
    Ewing, James R.
    [J]. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2014, 27 (10) : 1230 - 1238
  • [2] Tumour heterogeneity in the clinic
    Bedard, Philippe L.
    Hansen, Aaron R.
    Ratain, Mark J.
    Siu, Lillian L.
    [J]. NATURE, 2013, 501 (7467) : 355 - 364
  • [3] Field Strength Dependence of R1 and R2* Relaxivities of Human Whole Blood to ProHance, Vasovist, and Deoxyhemoglobin
    Blockley, N. P.
    Jiang, L.
    Gardener, A. G.
    Ludman, C. N.
    Francis, S. T.
    Gowland, P. A.
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2008, 60 (06) : 1313 - 1320
  • [4] Influence of molecular parameters and increasing magnetic field strength on relaxivity of gadolinium- and manganese-based T1 contrast agents
    Caravan, Peter
    Farrar, Christian T.
    Frullano, Luca
    Uppal, Ritika
    [J]. CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2009, 4 (02) : 89 - 100
  • [5] MRI reveals the in vivo cellular and vascular response to BEZ235 in ovarian cancer xenografts with different PI3-kinase pathway activity
    Cebulla, J.
    Huuse, E. M.
    Pettersen, K.
    van der Veen, A.
    Kim, E.
    Andersen, S.
    Prestvik, W. S.
    Bofin, A. M.
    Pathak, A. P.
    Bjorkoy, G.
    Bathen, T. F.
    Moestue, S. A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 112 (03) : 504 - 513
  • [6] DCE MRI Technical Committee, 2012, DCE MRI QUANT PROF Q
  • [7] Combined T2* and T1 measurements for improved perfusion and permeability studies in high field using dynamic contrast enhancement
    de Bazelaire, Cedric
    Rofsky, Neil M.
    Duhamel, Guillaume
    Zhang, Jingbo
    Michaelson, M. Dror
    George, Daniel
    Alsop, David C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (09) : 2083 - 2091
  • [8] Model selection in measures of vascular parameters using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: experimental and clinical applications
    Ewing, James R.
    Bagher-Ebadian, Hassan
    [J]. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2013, 26 (08) : 1028 - 1041
  • [9] Furman-Haran E, 2014, TECHNOL CANCER RES T, V13, P445, DOI [10.7785/tcrt.2013.600263, 10.7785/tcrtexpress.2013.600263]
  • [10] A transgenic mouse prostate cancer model
    Gingrich, JR
    Greenberg, NM
    [J]. TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY, 1996, 24 (04) : 502 - 504