Morphology reinforces proposed molecular phylogenetic affinities: a revised classification for Gelechioidea (Lepidoptera)

被引:99
作者
Heikkila, Maria [1 ]
Mutanen, Marko [2 ]
Kekkonen, Mari [1 ]
Kaila, Lauri [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Zool Unit, Finnish Museum Nat Hist, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Oulu, Dept Biol, Biodivers Unit, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
MEYRICK LEPIDOPTERA; MOTHS; GENUS; INFERENCE; SUPERMATRICES; EVOLUTION; RADIATION; PROGRAM; IMPROVE; TAXA;
D O I
10.1111/cla.12064
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Gelechioidea are one of the most species rich and least studied superfamilies of Lepidoptera. We examine the interrelationships within the superfamily using the densest taxon sampling to date, combined with the most extensive ever morphological and molecular character data. We perform partitioned and combined analyses using maximum likelihood, Bayesian and parsimony approaches. The combined dataset consists of 155 exemplar species of Gelechioidea, representing nearly all subfamilies recognized in recent classifications. Parsimony analyses are performed with a dataset including 28 additional terminal taxa with only morphological data available. We use eight genes with a total of 6127bp, and morphological data with 253 characters derived from larval, pupal, and adult morphology. The analyses of combined data yield more resolved trees and significantly better-supported groupings than either dataset when analysed alone. The recurrent monophyletic groupings in all our model-based analyses support a revision of the family classification. Deeper relationships vary between analyses and data partitions, leaving them ambiguous. The place of the root remains a challenge for future research. We propose a revised classification and suggest the division of Gelechioidea into 16 families. We redefine Depressariidae Meyrick, 1883 for a monophylum that includes Acriinae, Aeolanthinae, Cryptolechiinae, Depressariinae, Ethmiinae, Hypercalliinae, Hypertrophinae, Peleopodinae, Oditinae, Stenomatinae, Carcina, and a diversity of predominantly New World taxa previously excluded from Lypusidae (Amphisbatidae s. authors) but left without family position. A monophyletic Oecophoridae s. s., including Deuterogoniinae and Pleurotinae, is obtained for the first time with significant support. Elachistidae s. l. is found to be polyphyletic, and Elachistidae is restricted to comprise Agonoxeninae, Elachistinae, and Parametriotinae. Batrachedridae are polyphyletic, with several genera pending further study. Apart from the core Batrachedra, the taxa previously included in this family are grouped in an expanded Pterolonchidae, together with Coelopoetinae and Syringopainae. Lypusidae s. s. and Chimabachidae form a monophylum; Chimabachinae is united with Lypusidae as a subfamily, stat. n. Our results contradict the subfamily classifications of several families, notably Lecithoceridae and Autostichidae, but due to insufficient sampling of taxa we refrain from comprehensive taxonomic conclusions on the subfamily level, and encourage focused studies to resolve these groups. (C) The Willi Hennig Society 2013.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 589
页数:27
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]  
Adamski D., 1989, MISSISSIPPI AGR FORE, V165, P1
[2]   Variation of wing venation in Elachistidae (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea): methodology and implications to systematics [J].
Albrecht, A ;
Kaila, L .
SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1997, 22 (03) :185-198
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, CIPRES PORTALS
[4]   Larval morphology of Central European species of genus Stephensia Stainton, 1858 (Lepidoptera, Elachistidae) [J].
Baran, Tomasz .
DEUTSCHE ENTOMOLOGISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 2010, 57 (02) :149-158
[5]   Lack of resolution in the animal phylogeny: Closely spaced cladogeneses or undetected systematic errors? [J].
Baurain, Denis ;
Brinkmann, Henner ;
Philippe, Herve .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2007, 24 (01) :6-9
[6]  
Becker V.O., 1984, P27
[7]  
Bengtsson B.., 1997, SCYTHRIDIDAE MICROLE, V2
[8]   A review of long-branch attraction [J].
Bergsten, J .
CLADISTICS, 2005, 21 (02) :163-193
[9]  
BREMER K, 1988, EVOLUTION, V42, P795, DOI [10.1111/j.1558-5646.1988.tb02497.x, 10.2307/2408870]
[10]   BRANCH SUPPORT AND TREE STABILITY [J].
BREMER, K .
CLADISTICS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE WILLI HENNIG SOCIETY, 1994, 10 (03) :295-304