Did carbon trade improve green production performance? Evidence from China

被引:100
作者
Yang, Lisha [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yutianhao [3 ]
Liu, Hongxun [4 ]
机构
[1] Huaqiao Univ, Inst Econ Dev & Reform, Xiamen 361021, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Huaqiao Univ, Sch Econ & Finance, Quanzhou 362021, Fujian, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Econ, Madison, WI USA
[4] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Econ & Finance, Xian 710061, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Carbon-emission trading scheme (ETS); Green production performance; Pilot ETSs in China; Difference-in-difference model; Non-radial directional distance function; DIRECTIONAL DISTANCE FUNCTION; CAP-AND-TRADE; QUASI-NATURAL EXPERIMENT; EU ETS; ECONOMIC-PERFORMANCE; SCHEME ETS; ENERGY; ALLOCATION; EFFICIENCY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105185
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Carbon-emission Trading Scheme (ETS) in China has been put in force since 2013 in some pilot provinces/cities and the nationwide ETS under construction is expected to operate soon. Experience and lessons in the pilot markets are of great value. One preliminary issue worth an investigation is whether the pilot ETSs worked costeffectively. To answer that question, we construct a Difference-in-Difference (DiD) model in this paper to test if the pilot ETSs improved green production performance (GPP). Because the GPP is not a statistical index yet, we use a non-radial directional distance function (NDDF) in a non-parametric data envelop analysis (DEA) framework to evaluate the GPP for 10 provinces (4 with pilot ETSs while 6 without an ETS) in eastern China over 2006?2016. We find: (1) GPP in all the provinces increased over time. However, most of the provinces have great potentials to further improve their GPP. (2) The average GPP in the treatment group (with pilot ETSs) was larger than that in the control group (without an ETS). The GPP differences between the two groups increased after the pilot ETSs were implemented. (3) The pilot ETSs significantly improved the GPP by approximately 10%. (4) The GPP in the treatment group has been improved since the pilot ETS policy was released in late 2011 rather than the pilot ETSs were put in force starting from 2013. (5) Due to the low carbon prices in the pilot markets, the impact of the pilot ETSs on the GPP decreased after 2013. Carbon-emission Trading Scheme (ETS) in China has been put in force since 2013 in some pilot provinces/cities and the nationwide ETS under construction is expected to operate soon. Experience and lessons in the pilot markets are of great value. One preliminary issue worth an investigation is whether the pilot ETSs worked costeffectively. To answer that question, we construct a Difference-in-Difference (DiD) model in this paper to test if the pilot ETSs improved green production performance (GPP). Because the GPP is not a statistical index yet, we use a non-radial directional distance function (NDDF) in a non-parametric data envelop analysis (DEA) framework to evaluate the GPP for 10 provinces (4 with pilot ETSs while 6 without an ETS) in eastern China over 2006-2016. We find: (1) GPP in all the provinces increased over time. However, most of the provinces have great potentials to further improve their GPP. (2) The average GPP in the treatment group (with pilot ETSs) was larger than that in the control group (without an ETS). The GPP differences between the two groups increased after the pilot ETSs were implemented. (3) The pilot ETSs significantly improved the GPP by approximately 10%. (4) The GPP in the treatment group has been improved since the pilot ETS policy was released in late 2011 rather than the pilot ETSs were put in force starting from 2013. (5) Due to the low carbon prices in the pilot markets, the impact of the pilot ETSs on the GPP decreased after 2013. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Pricing climate risk mitigation [J].
Aldy, Joseph E. .
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2015, 5 (05) :396-398
[2]   The Promise and Problems of Pricing Carbon: Theory and Experience [J].
Aldy, Joseph E. ;
Stavins, Robert N. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT & DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 21 (02) :152-180
[3]  
Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Emissions Trading Worldwide: Status Report 2019
[5]   Understanding the trend of total factor carbon productivity in the world: Insights from convergence analysis [J].
Bai, Caiquan ;
Du, Kerui ;
Yu, Ying ;
Fen, Chen .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 81 :698-708
[6]   Policy stringency under the European Union Emission trading system and its impact on technological change in the energy sector [J].
Bel, Germa ;
Joseph, Stephan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 117 :434-444
[7]   Carbon pricing in the EU: Evaluation of different EU ETS reform options [J].
Brink, Corjan ;
Vollebergh, Herman R. J. ;
van der Werf, Edwin .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 97 :603-617
[8]   Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China [J].
Cai, Xiqian ;
Lu, Yi ;
Wu, Mingqin ;
Yu, Linhui .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2016, 123 :73-85
[9]   Environmental Policy and Directed Technological Change: Evidence from the European Carbon Market [J].
Calel, Raphael ;
Dechezlepretre, Antoine .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2016, 98 (01) :173-191
[10]   Equality and CO2 emissions distribution in climate change integrated assessment modelling [J].
Cantore, Nicola ;
Padilla, Emilio .
ENERGY, 2010, 35 (01) :298-313