Why do organizations not learn from incidents? Bottlenecks, causes and conditions for a failure to effectively learn

被引:59
作者
Drupsteen, Linda [1 ,2 ]
Hasle, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] TNO, NL-2316 ZL Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Aalborg Univ, Dept Business & Management, Ctr Ind Prod, DK-2450 Copenhagen SV, Denmark
关键词
Organization; Safety; 'Failure to learn'; Causes; Cases; Accident; RECOMMENDATIONS; DISASTERS; ACCIDENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.027
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
If organizations would be able to learn more effectively from incidents that occurred in the past, future incidents and consequential injury or damage can be prevented. To improve learning from incidents, this study aimed to identify limiting factors, i.e. the causes of the failure to effectively learn. In seven organizations focus groups were held to discuss factors that according to employees contributed to the failure to learn. By use of a model of the learning from incidents process, the steps, where difficulties for learning arose, became visible, and the causes for these difficulties could be studied. Difficulties were identified in multiple steps of the learning process, but most difficulties became visible when planning actions, which is the phase that bridges the gap from incident investigation to actions for improvement. The main causes for learning difficulties, which were identified by the participants in this study, were tightly related to the learning process, but some indirect causes - or conditions - such as lack of ownership and limitations in expertise were also mentioned. The results illustrate that there are two types of causes for the failure to effectively learn: direct causes and indirect causes, here called conditions. By actively and systematically studying learning, more conditions might be identified and indicators for a successful learning process may be determined. Studying the learning process does, however, require a shift from learning from incidents to learning to learn. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 358
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1979, ORG LEARNING THEORY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, ORG CULTURE LEADERSH
[4]   Implementing recommendations from accident investigations: A case study of inter-organisational challenges [J].
Cedergren, Alexander .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2013, 53 :133-141
[5]   Organizing learning processes on risks by using the bow-tie representation [J].
Chevreau, FR ;
Wybo, JL ;
Cauchois, D .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2006, 130 (03) :276-283
[6]   Complex learning: organizational learning from disasters [J].
Choularton, R .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2001, 39 (1-2) :61-70
[7]  
Dekker S. W. A., 2009, COGN TECHNOL WORK, V11, P177, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S10111-008-0110-7, 10.1007/s10111-008-0110-7]
[8]  
Drupsteen L., 2012, INT C HLTH SAF ENV O
[9]   What Is Learning? A Review of the Safety Literature to Define Learning from Incidents, Accidents and Disasters [J].
Drupsteen, Linda ;
Guldenmund, Frank W. .
JOURNAL OF CONTINGENCIES AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT, 2014, 22 (02) :81-96
[10]   Critical Steps in Learning From Incidents: Using Learning Potential in the Process From Reporting an Incident to Accident Prevention [J].
Drupsteen, Linda ;
Groeneweg, Jop ;
Zwetsloot, Gerard I. J. M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS, 2013, 19 (01) :63-77