Risk Evaluation in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Using Fuzzy Measure and Fuzzy Integral

被引:36
作者
Liu, Haibin [1 ]
Deng, Xinyang [1 ]
Jiang, Wen [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Elect & Informat, Xian 710072, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
来源
SYMMETRY-BASEL | 2017年 / 9卷 / 08期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
failure mode; effects analysis; risk priority number; fuzzy measure; fuzzy integral; Choquet integral; PRIORITIZATION;
D O I
10.3390/sym9080162
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a popular and useful approach applied to examine potential failures in different products, designs, processes, and services. As a vital index, the risk priority number (RPN) can determine the risk priorities of failure modes by some risk factors such as occurrence (O), severity (S), and detection (D). However, in FMEA, the traditional risk priority number approach has some shortcomings, especially in setting the weight of risk factors. This paper presents an improved risk priority number approach based on a fuzzy measure and fuzzy integral. A fuzzy measure is used to reflect the importance of the individual indicators and the indicator set and a fuzzy integral is a nonlinear function defined on the basis of fuzzy measure. The weights of risk factors given by domain experts are seen as fuzzy densities to generate a l-fuzzy measure which can reflect the weights' difference and relevance about risk factors. Then, the Choquet integral is used to fuse every value of risk factors about failure modes so as to obtain the comprehensive evaluation result. The result can reflect the comprehensive risk level, so it has a definite physical significance. Finally, an illustrative example and a comparison with another approach are given to show the effectiveness of the proposed approach in the paper.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Boran F. E., 2014, P KEER 2014 INT C KA, P1235
[2]   FUZZY-LOGIC PRIORITIZATION OF FAILURES IN A SYSTEM FAILURE MODE, EFFECTS AND CRITICALITY ANALYSIS [J].
BOWLES, JB ;
PELAEZ, CE .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1995, 50 (02) :203-213
[3]   Risk prioritization in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis using interval type-2 fuzzy sets [J].
Bozdag, Erhan ;
Asan, Umut ;
Soyer, Ayberk ;
Serdarasan, Seyda .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2015, 42 (08) :4000-4015
[4]   Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis [J].
Braglia, M ;
Frosolini, M ;
Montanari, R .
QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 19 (05) :425-443
[5]   A perceptual computing-based method to prioritize failure modes in failure mode and effect analysis and its application to edible bird nest farming [J].
Chai, Kolk Chin ;
Jong, Chian Haur ;
Tay, Kai Meng ;
Lim, Chee Peng .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2016, 49 :734-747
[6]   Fuzzy FMEA application to improve decision-making process in an emergency department [J].
Chanamool, Nalinee ;
Naenna, Thanakorn .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2016, 43 :441-453
[7]   Evaluating the risk of failure using the fuzzy OWA and DEMATEL method [J].
Chang, Kuei-Hu ;
Cheng, Ching-Hsue .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2011, 22 (02) :113-129
[8]   Development of a fuzzy FMEA based product design system [J].
Chin, Kwai-Sang ;
Chan, Allen ;
Yang, Jian-Bo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 36 (7-8) :633-649
[9]   An Evidential Axiomatic Design Approach for Decision Making Using the Evaluation of Belief Structure Satisfaction to Uncertain Target Values [J].
Deng, Xinyang ;
Jiang, Wen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2018, 33 (01) :15-32
[10]   Zero-Sum Matrix Game with Payoffs of Dempster-Shafer Belief Structures and Its Applications on Sensors [J].
Deng, Xinyang ;
Jiang, Wen ;
Zhang, Jiandong .
SENSORS, 2017, 17 (04)