The Effects of Corporate Venture Capital, Founder Incumbency, and Their Interaction on Entrepreneurial Firms' R&D Investment Strategies

被引:52
作者
Paik, Yongwook [1 ]
Woo, Heejin [2 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Olin Business Sch, Strategy, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Calif State Univ Fullerton, Mihaylo Coll Business & Econ, Management, Fullerton, CA 92834 USA
关键词
corporate venture capital (CVC); founder; R&D investment; knowledge spillover; entrepreneurship; corporate governance; OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE; PROPENSITY SCORE; INNOVATION; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; SURVIVAL; MODELS; BOARD;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.2017.1133
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Corporate venture capital (CVC) investment has increasingly become an important source of entrepreneurial finance. Accordingly, while scholars have traditionally focused on understanding the main motivations behind CVC activity and its impact on the investing corporate firm, more recently, scholars have also started to emphasize the importance of understanding the impact of CVC investment on the investee venture. In particular, these recent studies commonly show that CVC investment has a positive effect on the venture's innovation. While the positive link between CVC investment and the venture's innovation output is well established in the literature, the organizational mechanisms through which this relationship unfolds within the venture remain relatively underexplored. In this study, we fill this gap in the literature by examining the effects of CVC ownership, founder incumbency, and the CVC investor-founder interaction on research and development (R&D) investment strategies in venture capital (VC)-financed, technology-based entrepreneurial ventures. In doing so, we aim to provide a novel explanation of the organizational mechanisms that lead to greater investment in research and development (R&D), especially with regard to the interaction between CVC investors and founder managers. We argue that CVC ownership and founder incumbency positively affect entrepreneurial firms' R&D investment and, more importantly, that the CVC ownership effect is effectively amplified when the founder is an incumbent top manager because of goal congruence and knowledge spillover from the CVC firm. Our empirical analysis supports our hypotheses while addressing potential endogeneity concerns. Our results also support various mechanisms by utilizing the data on CVC investor's board membership, CVC investor heterogeneity, the founder's technological background, and the investee venture's industry.
引用
收藏
页码:670 / 689
页数:20
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   Innovation and Institutional Ownership [J].
Aghion, Philippe ;
Van Reenen, John ;
Zingales, Luigi .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (01) :277-304
[2]   Are entrepreneurial venture's innovation rates sensitive to investor complementary assets? Comparing biotech ventures backed by corporate and independent VCs [J].
Alvarez-Garrido, Elisa ;
Dushnitsky, Gary .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (05) :819-834
[3]   Publications and patents in corporate venture-backed biotech [J].
Alvarez-Garrido, Elisa ;
Dushnitsky, Gary .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2013, 31 (06) :495-497
[4]  
Angrist JD, 1996, J AM STAT ASSOC, V91, P444, DOI 10.2307/2291629
[5]  
Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
[6]   Estimation of limited dependent variable models with dummy endogenous regressors: Simple strategies for empirical practice [J].
Angrist, JD .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2001, 19 (01) :2-16
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1967, Cognitive Psychology
[8]   DO NEWLY PUBLIC ACQUIRERS BENEFIT OR SUFFER FROM THEIR PRE-IPO AFFILIATIONS WITH UNDERWRITERS AND VCS? [J].
Arikan, Asli M. ;
Capron, Laurence .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (12) :1257-1289
[9]   The boundaries and limitations of agency theory and stewardship theory in the venture capitalist/entrepreneur relationship [J].
Arthurs, JD ;
Busenitz, LW .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2003, 28 (02) :145-162
[10]   The determinants of board structure at the initial public offering [J].
Baker, M ;
Gompers, PA .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2003, 46 (02) :569-598