Detecting microsatellites within genomes: significant variation among algorithms

被引:65
作者
Leclercq, Sebastien
Rivals, Eric
Jarne, Philippe
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier 2, CNRS, UMR 5506, LIRMM, Montpellier, France
[2] Univ Montpellier 2, CNRS, UMR 5175, CEFE, Montpellier, France
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2105-8-125
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Microsatellites are short, tandemly-repeated DNA sequences which are widely distributed among genomes. Their structure, role and evolution can be analyzed based on exhaustive extraction from sequenced genomes. Several dedicated algorithms have been developed for this purpose. Here, we compared the detection efficiency of five of them (TRF, Mreps, Sputnik, STAR, and RepeatMasker). Results: Our analysis was first conducted on the human X chromosome, and microsatellite distributions were characterized by microsatellite number, length, and divergence from a pure motif. The algorithms work with user-defined parameters, and we demonstrate that the parameter values chosen can strongly influence microsatellite distributions. The five algorithms were then compared by fixing parameters settings, and the analysis was extended to three other genomes (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Neurospora crassa and Drosophila melanogaster) spanning a wide range of size and structure. Significant differences for all characteristics of microsatellites were observed among algorithms, but not among genomes, for both perfect and imperfect microsatellites. Striking differences were detected for short microsatellites (below 20 bp), regardless of motif. Conclusion: Since the algorithm used strongly influences empirical distributions, studies analyzing microsatellite evolution based on a comparison between empirical and theoretical size distributions should therefore be considered with caution. We also discuss why a typological definition of microsatellites limits our capacity to capture their genomic distributions.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster [J].
Adams, MD ;
Celniker, SE ;
Holt, RA ;
Evans, CA ;
Gocayne, JD ;
Amanatides, PG ;
Scherer, SE ;
Li, PW ;
Hoskins, RA ;
Galle, RF ;
George, RA ;
Lewis, SE ;
Richards, S ;
Ashburner, M ;
Henderson, SN ;
Sutton, GG ;
Wortman, JR ;
Yandell, MD ;
Zhang, Q ;
Chen, LX ;
Brandon, RC ;
Rogers, YHC ;
Blazej, RG ;
Champe, M ;
Pfeiffer, BD ;
Wan, KH ;
Doyle, C ;
Baxter, EG ;
Helt, G ;
Nelson, CR ;
Miklos, GLG ;
Abril, JF ;
Agbayani, A ;
An, HJ ;
Andrews-Pfannkoch, C ;
Baldwin, D ;
Ballew, RM ;
Basu, A ;
Baxendale, J ;
Bayraktaroglu, L ;
Beasley, EM ;
Beeson, KY ;
Benos, PV ;
Berman, BP ;
Bhandari, D ;
Bolshakov, S ;
Borkova, D ;
Botchan, MR ;
Bouck, J ;
Brokstein, P .
SCIENCE, 2000, 287 (5461) :2185-2195
[2]  
[Anonymous], BIOINFORMATICS S1
[3]  
Arzimanoglou II, 1998, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V82, P1808, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980515)82:10<1808::AID-CNCR2>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-J
[5]   The length distribution of perfect dimer repetitive DNA is consistent with its evolution by an unbiased single-step mutation process [J].
Bell, GI ;
Jurka, J .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION, 1997, 44 (04) :414-421
[6]   d(GA•TC)n microsatellite DNA sequences enhance homologous DNA recombination in SV40 minichromosomes [J].
Benet, A ;
Mollá, G ;
Azorín, F .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (23) :4617-4622
[7]  
BENSON G, 1999, NUCL ACIDS RES, V27
[8]   Dinucleotide repeats in the Drosophila and human genomes have complex, length-dependent mutation processes [J].
Calabrese, P ;
Durrett, R .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2003, 20 (05) :715-725
[9]   TROLL-Tandem Repeat Occurrence Locator [J].
Castelo, AT ;
Martins, W ;
Gao, GR .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2002, 18 (04) :634-636
[10]   Microsatellites: consensus and controversy [J].
Chambers, GK ;
MacAvoy, ES .
COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY B-BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2000, 126 (04) :455-476