The present study treats the topic of the interdisciplinary in the posgrade education, with the purpose of valuing the relevancy of some structural elements linked to the design of a theoretical -methodological conception of the interdisciplinary in the academic formation of master, for the prevention of professional illnesses. Among the used methods they are identified in the theoretical order the historical-logical one, the analytic-synthetic one and the systematizing. In the empiric order, it was considered the revision of documents and the consultation to experts. The approaches valorative of the experts were contrasted with the valuations emitted by the members of a focal group. This procedure contributed to the conformation of a result of more consistency and reliability, being evidenced by means of the employment of a scale valorative of five options, a prevalence of valued indicators of Appropriate and Very appropriate. Consent was identified, around the significance of the dynamics of the levels of interdisciplinary sustentation. In conclusive terms it is informed that the approaches valorative on the subjected structural elements to consultation, among them: foundations and ideas rectors evidenced a high relevancy, in correspondence with the proposed objective.
