Production of Hydrocarbon Fuel Using Two-Step Torrefaction and Fast Pyrolysis of Pine. Part 2: Life-Cycle Carbon Footprint

被引:18
作者
Winjobi, Olumide [1 ]
Zhou, Wen [1 ,2 ]
Kulas, Daniel [1 ]
Nowicki, Jakob [1 ]
Shonnard, David R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan Technol Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Houghton, MI 49931 USA
[2] Michigan Technol Univ, Sustainable Futures Inst, Houghton, MI 49931 USA
来源
ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING | 2017年 / 5卷 / 06期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Torrefaction; Fast pyrolysis; Catalytic upgrade; Process simulation; LCA; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; BIOMASS FAST PYROLYSIS; BIO-OIL; CATALYSTS; BIOCHAR;
D O I
10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00373
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
This study, as part II of two companion papers, investigated the environmental performance of liquid hydrocarbon biofuel production via fast pyrolysis of pine through two pathways: a one-step pathway via fast pyrolysis only, and a two-step pathway that includes a torrefaction step prior to fast pyrolysis. Fast pyrolysis in all cases took place at a temperature of 530 degrees C whereas for the two-step pathways, torrefaction was investigated at temperatures of 290, 310, and 330 degrees C. Bio-oil produced was then catalytically upgraded to hydrocarbon biofuel. Different scenarios for providing the required process heat either by using fossil energy or renewable energy, as well as the effect of heat integration, were also investigated. Our life cycle analysis indicated that using the energy allocation approach, a two-step heat integrated pathway with torrefaction taking place at 330 degrees C had the lowest global warming potential among all scenarios of about 29.0 g CO2 equiv/MJ biofuel. Using the system expansion approach, significantly higher reductions in GHG emissions of about 56 to 265% relative to conventional gasoline were observed for the heat integrated processes. More modest percentage reduction in emissions of about 34 to 67% was observed across all scenarios using the energy allocation approach.
引用
收藏
页码:4541 / 4551
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of wood pellet production with torrefaction [J].
Adams, P. W. R. ;
Shirley, J. E. J. ;
McManus, M. C. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 138 :367-380
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Environmental management-Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework
[3]   The influence of catalysts on biofuel life cycle analysis (LCA) [J].
Benavides, Pahola Thathiana ;
Cronauer, Donald C. ;
Adom, Felix ;
Wang, Zhichao ;
Dunn, Jennifer B. .
SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2017, 11 :53-59
[4]   Fast pyrolysis of biomass thermally pretreated by torrefaction [J].
Boateng, A. A. ;
Mullen, C. A. .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS, 2013, 100 :95-102
[5]   A techno-economic comparison of power production by biomass fast pyrolysis with gasification and combustion [J].
Bridgwater, AV ;
Toft, AJ ;
Brammer, JG .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2002, 6 (03) :181-248
[6]   Effects of Water Washing and Torrefaction Pretreatments on Corn Stalk Pyrolysis: Combined Study Using TG-FTIR and a Fixed Bed Reactor [J].
Cen, Kehui ;
Chen, Dengyu ;
Wang, Jiayang ;
Cai, Yitong ;
Wang, Lei .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2016, 30 (12) :10627-10634
[7]   Ultra-Low Carbon Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants through Bio-Oil Co-Firing and Biochar Sequestration [J].
Dang, Qi ;
Wright, Mark Mba ;
Brown, Robert C. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 49 (24) :14688-14695
[8]  
Domalski E.S., 1972, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, V1, P221, DOI [DOI 10.1063/1.3253099, 10.1063/1.3253099]
[9]   Biofuels: Environment, technology and food security [J].
Escobar, Jose C. ;
Lora, Electo S. ;
Venturini, Osvaldo J. ;
Yanez, Edgar E. ;
Castillo, Edgar F. ;
Almazan, Oscar .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2009, 13 (6-7) :1275-1287
[10]   Drying of biomass for second generation synfuel production [J].
Fagernas, L. ;
Brammer, J. ;
Wilen, C. ;
Lauer, M. ;
Verhoeff, F. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2010, 34 (09) :1267-1277