Assessment of Complex Masonry Structures with GPR Compared to Other Non-Destructive Testing Studies

被引:51
作者
Santos-Assuncao, Sonia [1 ]
Perez-Gracia, Vega [1 ]
Caselles, Oriol [2 ]
Clapes, Jaume [2 ]
Salinas, Victor [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Catalonia, Escola Univ Engn Tecn Ind, Dept Strength Mat & Struct Engn, Barcelona 08036, Spain
[2] Tech Univ Catalonia, Dept Geotech Engn & Geosci, Barcelona 08034, Spain
关键词
ground-penetrating radar (GPR); seismic tomography; cultural heritage; masonry column; cylindrical interpolation; 3D radar imaging; GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR; CULTURAL-HERITAGE; RESOLUTION; BUILDINGS; RESTORATION;
D O I
10.3390/rs6098220
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Columns are one of the most usual supporting structures in a large number of cultural heritage buildings. However, it is difficult to obtain accurate information about their inner structure. Non-destructive testing (NDT) methodologies are usually applied, but results depend on the complexity of the column. Non-flat external surfaces and unknown and irregular internal materials complicate the interpretation of data. This work presents the study of one column by using ground-penetrating radar (GPR) combined with seismic tomography, under laboratory conditions, in order to obtain the maximum information about the structure. This column belongs to a "Modernista" building from Barcelona (Spain). These columns are built with irregular and fragmented clay bricks and mortar. The internal irregular and complex structure causes complicated 2D images, evidencing the existence of many different targets. However, 3D images provide valuable information about the presence and the state of an internal tube and show, in addition, that the column is made of uneven and broken bricks. GPR images present high correlation with seismic data and endoscopy observation carried out in situ. In conclusion, the final result of the study provides information and 3D images of damaged areas and inner structures. Comparing the different methods to the real structure of the column, the potential and limitations of GPR were evaluated.
引用
收藏
页码:8220 / 8237
页数:18
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Investigation procedures for the diagnosis of historic masonries [J].
Binda, L ;
Saisi, A ;
Tiraboschi, C .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2000, 14 (04) :199-233
[2]   Seismic refraction, isotropic anisotropic seismic tomography on an ancient monument (Antonino and Faustina temple AD 141) [J].
Cardarelli, E ;
de Nardis, R .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2001, 49 (02) :228-240
[3]   Numerical modelling and experimental verification of GPR to investigate ring separation in brick masonry arch bridges [J].
Diamanti, Nectaria ;
Giannopoulos, Antonios ;
Forde, Michael C. .
NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 41 (05) :354-363
[4]   The Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem: Non-destructive tests for the structural knowledge [J].
Faella, Giuseppe ;
Frunzio, Giorgio ;
Guadagnuolo, Mariateresa ;
Donadio, Alfonso ;
Ferri, Luca .
JOURNAL OF CULTURAL HERITAGE, 2012, 13 (04) :E27-E41
[5]   Evaluation of the concrete electromagnetics properties by using radar measurements in a context of building sustainability [J].
Ferrieres, X. ;
Klysz, G. ;
Mazet, P. ;
Balayssac, J. P. .
COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, 180 (08) :1277-1281
[6]   GPR survey applied to modernista buildings in Barcelona:: The cultural heritage of the College of Industrial Engineering [J].
Gonzalez-Drigo, Ramon ;
Perez-Gracia, Vega ;
Di Capua, Daniel ;
Pujades, Luis G. .
JOURNAL OF CULTURAL HERITAGE, 2008, 9 (02) :196-202
[7]  
Goodman D., 2004, GPR-SLICE. Ground Penetrating Radar Imaging Software. User's Manual
[8]  
Goodman D, 2009, GROUND PENETRATING RADAR THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, P479, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-53348-7.00015-6
[9]  
Gracia VP, 2000, J APPL GEOPHYS, V43, P167
[10]   NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTS TO EXPLORE THE POTENTIAL OF GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR (GPR) IN DETECTING UNFILLED JOINTS IN BRICK MASONRY STRUCTURES [J].
Hamrouche, Rani ;
Klysz, Gilles ;
Balayssac, Jean-Paul ;
Rhazi, Jamal ;
Ballivy, Gerard .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE, 2012, 6 (06) :648-664