Robust modelling of soil diffuse reflectance spectra by "bagging-partial least squares regression"

被引:112
作者
Rossel, R. A. Viscarra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Agr Food & Nat Resources, Australian Ctr Precis Agr, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
partial least squares regression; bootstrap aggregation; bagging; soil diffuse reflectance spectra;
D O I
10.1255/jnirs.694
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Visible (vis), near infrared (NIR) and mid infrared (mid-IR) diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) coupled with partial least squares regression (PLSR) are increasingly being used in the agricultural and environmental sciences as an efficient complement to conventional laboratory analysis. The DRS techniques are rapid, relatively cheap and more efficient for obtaining data than conventional analysis, especially when a large number of samples and analyses are required. A single spectrum may be used to predict various physical, chemical and biological soil properties. The robustness of PLSR models and their predictions may be improved by combining the implementation of PLSR with bootstrap aggregation or "bagging". Bagging aims to reduce the variance of predictions by aggregating a number of models obtained in the course of re-sampling. The aim of this work was to test the implementation of bagging with PLSR (bagging-PLSR) using vis-NIR and mid-IR soil diffuse reflectance spectra to predict soil organic carbon (OC). Bagging-PLSR was shown to: (i) be more robust than PLSR alone, (ii) be less prone to over fitting and improve prediction accuracy and (iii) provide a measure of the uncertainty of the models and their predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 47
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
AFNOR, 1996, QUAL SOLS REC NORM F
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, MULTIVARIATE CALIBRA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, STAT APPL PROBAB MON
[4]   Using iterated bagging to debias regressions [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (03) :261-277
[5]   Bagging predictors [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 1996, 24 (02) :123-140
[6]   Data augmentation: an alternative approach to the analysis of spectroscopic data [J].
Conlin, AK ;
Martin, EB ;
Morris, AJ .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 1998, 44 (1-2) :161-173
[7]  
Friedman J, 2001, The elements of statistical learning, V1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5
[8]   Some recent trends in the calibration literature [J].
Geladi, P .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2002, 60 (1-2) :211-224
[9]   PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES METHODS FOR SPECTRAL ANALYSES .1. RELATION TO OTHER QUANTITATIVE CALIBRATION METHODS AND THE EXTRACTION OF QUALITATIVE INFORMATION [J].
HAALAND, DM ;
THOMAS, EV .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1988, 60 (11) :1193-1202
[10]   A performance comparison of modem statistical techniques for molecular descriptor selection and retention prediction in chromatographic QSRR studies [J].
Hancock, T ;
Put, R ;
Coomans, D ;
Vander Heyden, Y ;
Everingham, Y .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2005, 76 (02) :185-196