X-ray imaging and 3D reconstruction of in-flight exploding foil initiator flyers

被引:42
作者
Willey, T. M. [1 ]
Champley, K. [1 ]
Hodgin, R. [1 ]
Lauderbach, L. [1 ]
Bagge-Hansen, M. [1 ]
May, C. [1 ]
Sanchez, N. [2 ]
Jensen, B. J. [2 ]
Iverson, A. [3 ]
van Buuren, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Livermore, CA 94551 USA
[2] Los Alamos Natl Lab, POB 1663, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[3] Natl Secur Technol LLC, Las Vegas, NV 89193 USA
关键词
Detonation - X ray analysis - Image reconstruction;
D O I
10.1063/1.4953681
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
Exploding foil initiators (EFIs), also known as slapper initiators or detonators, offer clear safety and timing advantages over other means of initiating detonation in high explosives. This work outlines a new capability for imaging and reconstructing three-dimensional images of operating EFIs. Flyer size and intended velocity were chosen based on parameters of the imaging system. The EFI metal plasma and plastic flyer traveling at 2.5 km/s were imaged with short similar to 80 ps pulses spaced 153.4 ns apart. A four-camera system acquired 4 images from successive x-ray pulses from each shot. The first frame was prior to bridge burst, the 2nd images the flyer about 0.16mm above the surface but edges of the foil and/or flyer are still attached to the substrate. The 3rd frame captures the flyer in flight, while the 4th shows a completely detached flyer in a position that is typically beyond where slappers strike initiating explosives. Multiple acquisitions at different incident angles and advanced computed tomography reconstruction algorithms were used to produce a 3-dimensional image of the flyer at 0.16 and 0.53mm above the surface. Both the x-ray images and the 3D reconstruction show a strong anisotropy in the shape of the flyer and underlying foil parallel vs. perpendicular to the initiating current and electrical contacts. These results provide detailed flyer morphology during the operation of the EFI. Published by AIP Publishing.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Preheating sensitization of a TATB composition part one:: Chemical evolution [J].
Belmas, R ;
Bry, A ;
David, C ;
Gautier, L ;
Keromnès, A ;
Poullain, D ;
Thevenot, G ;
Le Gallic, C ;
Chenault, J ;
Guillaumet, G .
PROPELLANTS EXPLOSIVES PYROTECHNICS, 2004, 29 (05) :282-286
[2]   Parametric Influences on the Sensitivity of Exploding Foil Initiators [J].
Chen, Qing-Chou ;
Fu, Qiu-Bo ;
Chen, Lang ;
Han, Zhong-Fei .
PROPELLANTS EXPLOSIVES PYROTECHNICS, 2014, 39 (04) :558-562
[3]  
Christensen J. S., 2010, 14 INT DET S, P156
[4]  
Davies HR, 2009, AIP CONF PROC, V1195, P283
[5]   Validated model-based simulation tool for design optimization of exploding foil initiators [J].
Ebenhoech, Stefan ;
Nau, Siegfried ;
Haering, Ivo .
JOURNAL OF DEFENSE MODELING AND SIMULATION-APPLICATIONS METHODOLOGY TECHNOLOGY-JDMS, 2015, 12 (02) :189-207
[6]  
Hrousis C. A., 2009, 40 INT ANN C ICT, P681
[7]   Dynamic experiment using IMPULSE at the Advanced Photon Source [J].
Jensen, B. J. ;
Ramos, K. J. ;
Iverson, A. J. ;
Bernier, J. ;
Carlson, C. A. ;
Yeager, J. D. ;
Fezzaa, K. ;
Hooks, D. E. .
18TH APS-SCCM AND 24TH AIRAPT, PTS 1-19, 2014, 500
[8]   Ultrafast, high resolution, phase contrast imaging of impact response with synchrotron radiation [J].
Jensen, B. J. ;
Luo, S. N. ;
Hooks, D. E. ;
Fezzaa, K. ;
Ramos, K. J. ;
Yeager, J. D. ;
Kwiatkowski, K. ;
Shimada, T. ;
Dattelbaum, D. M. .
AIP ADVANCES, 2012, 2 (01)
[9]  
Kumar P. D., 2012, 27 INT S BALL, V1-2, P928
[10]  
Lou S. N., 2012, REV SCI INSTRUM, V83