Using Icare HOME tonometry for follow-up of patients with open-angle glaucoma before and after selective laser trabeculoplasty

被引:15
作者
Awadalla, Mona S. [1 ]
Qassim, Ayub [1 ]
Hassall, Mark [1 ]
Nugyen, Thi T. [1 ]
Landers, John [1 ]
Craig, Jamie E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Dept Ophthalmol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
open-angle glaucoma; rebound tonometry; selective laser trabeculoplasty; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; SELF-TONOMETRY; FLUCTUATION; MANAGEMENT; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1111/ceo.13686
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Importance Monitoring the results of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) on intraocular pressure (IOP) using a home rebound tonometry. Background To evaluate the role of Icare HOME tonometry in open-angle glaucoma patients being treated with SLT. Design A clinic-based prospective case study. Participants Fourteen eyes from 14 patients diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma were recruited. Methods The trabecular meshwork of each eye was treated 360 degrees with a frequency-doubled Q-switched Nd:YAG laser. IOP was measured four times a day for a week before and after SLT. On the day of SLT, the patients were required to measure the IOP in the evening to record any IOP spikes. Main Outcome Measures The use of Icare HOME in following up patients post-laser trabeculoplasty without the need for clinic attendance. Results Icare HOME recorded a significant reduction of 5.12 mmHg in the mean IOP post-SLT (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.75-6.50 mmHg, P < .001). The maximum IOP was also reduced by 6.14 mmHg (95% CI 3.07-9.21, P < .001) with no IOP spikes recorded post-SLT. There was a reduction in IOP fluctuation post-SLT by 1.07 mmHg (95% CI 0.24-1.89 mmHg, P = .021). No adverse effects for using the Icare HOME were reported by the study participants. Conclusions and Relevance This methodology could be highly useful for facilitating safe follow-up of patients residing in remote and rural areas, thus reducing healthcare cost with better information on IOP.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 333
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2018, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
  • [2] Asrani S, 2000, J GLAUCOMA, V9, P134
  • [3] Prevalence and type of artefact with spectral domain optical coherence tomography macular ganglion cell imaging in glaucoma surveillance
    Awadalla, Mona S.
    Fitzgerald, Jude
    Andrew, Nicholas H.
    Zhou, Tiger
    Marshall, Henry
    Qassim, Ayub
    Hassell, Mark
    Casson, Robert J.
    Graham, Stuart L.
    Healey, Paul R.
    Agar, Ashish
    Galanopoulos, Anna
    Phipps, Simon
    Chappell, Angela
    Landers, John
    Craig, Jamie E.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (12):
  • [4] Fast and Elegant Numerical Linear Algebra Using the RcppEigen Package
    Bates, Douglas
    Eddelbuettel, Dirk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2013, 52 (05): : 1 - 24
  • [5] Long-term home monitoring of intraocular pressure in pediatric glaucoma
    Bitner, Derek P.
    Freedman, Sharon F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2016, 20 (06): : 515 - 518
  • [6] Prevalence of glaucoma and intraocular pressure distribution in a defined population -: The Egna-Neumarkt study
    Bonomi, L
    Marchini, G
    Marraffa, M
    Bernardi, P
    De Franco, I
    Perfetti, S
    Varotto, A
    Tenna, V
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 105 (02) : 209 - 215
  • [7] Glaucoma Suspect: Diagnosis and Management
    Chang, Robert T.
    Singh, Kuldev
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 5 (01): : 32 - 37
  • [8] Self-tonometry as a complement in the investigation of glaucoma patients
    Chen, Enping
    Querat, Laurence
    Akerstedt, Christina
    [J]. ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2016, 94 (08) : 788 - 792
  • [9] Self-measurement with Icare HOME tonometer, patients' feasibility and acceptability
    Cvenkel, Barbara
    Velkovska, Makedonka Atanasovska
    Jordanova, Vesna Dimovska
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 30 (02) : 258 - 263
  • [10] Evaluation of a new rebound tonometer for self-measurement of intraocular pressure
    Dabasia, Priya L.
    Lawrenson, John G.
    Murdoch, Ian E.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 100 (08) : 1139 - 1143