Archaeology, property, and prehistory

被引:62
作者
Earle, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Anthropol, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
landed vs moveable property; institutional vs private property; territoriality; alienation; marking;
D O I
10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.39
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
Property determines exclusive rights to things. It is a key theoretical concept in the social sciences and a material reality in human societies. Since the defining work of Lewis Henry Morgan, property has been studied by anthropologists interested in human economies, societies, and social evolution. Cross-cultural studies suggest systematic associations of contrasting property rights with particular characteristics of social institutions and resource developments. From the works of Childe, Adams, and Renfrew, archaeologists have considered property as related to ecological concepts of territoriality and to Marxist concepts of control and alienation. Techniques to study property archaeologically included patterns of labor investment, warfare, settlement distributions, and physical marking. Although each technique is open to alternative interpretations, combining the techniques provides a robust description of property regimes in prehistory.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 60
页数:22
相关论文
共 171 条
  • [1] Adams RobertMcCormick., 1966, EVOLUTION URBAN SOC
  • [2] Land tenure, archaeology, and the ancestral pueblo social landscape
    Adler, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL ARCHAEOLOGY, 1996, 15 (04) : 337 - 371
  • [3] [Anonymous], [No title captured]
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1996, Privatization in the Ancient near East and Classical World: A Colloquium Held at New York University, November 17-18, 1994
  • [5] [Anonymous], MAN CULTURE ANIMALS
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1943, J LEGAL POLITICAL SO
  • [7] [Anonymous], COMPANION ENCY ARCHA
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1994, ANTHR I EC
  • [9] [Anonymous], ASIAN PERSPECTIVES
  • [10] [Anonymous], RANKING RESOURCE EXC