Beyond territorial conceptions of entrepreneurial ecosystems: The dynamic spatiality of knowledge brokering in seed accelerators

被引:19
作者
Kuebart, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
Ibert, Oliver [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Res Soc & Space, Flakenstr 29-31, D-15537 Erkner, Germany
[2] Brandenburg Tech Univ Cottbus Senftenberg, Postfach 101344, D-03013 Cottbus, Germany
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR WIRTSCHAFTSGEOGRAPHIE | 2019年 / 63卷 / 2-4期
关键词
Accelerators; Entrepreneurial Ecosystems; knowledge brokers; Trans-locally shared practices; INNOVATION; COMMUNITIES; NETWORKS; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1515/zfw-2018-0012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In spatial terms, entrepreneurial ecosystems are mostly conceptualized as confined to a specific territory. At the same time, the growing relevance of entrepreneurship in digital fields is underlined. This paper argues that this is contradictory since territorial thinking underestimates the disruptive qualities of new entrepreneurial practices in the digital economy. Using process-based, qualitative case studies on seed accelerators from four regions: Amsterdam, Berlin, Detroit and Hamburg, this study seeks to explore knowledge brokering in entrepreneurship ecosystems and analyzes the corresponding spatial dynamics. Our findings imply that startups in digital fields share knowledge about business models and technologies in a way that is unattainable in classical knowledge clusters. Moreover, we show that most of the observed entrepreneurial practices in seed accelerators crucially rely on extra-regional resources and thus remain only incompletely embedded into the respective regions. Against the background of these results, we suggest that entrepreneurial ecosystems should not be primarily viewed as territorial phenomena. Instead, we suggest that the territorial view on entrepreneurship ecosystems should be complemented with a topological view that foregrounds entrepreneurship as a trans-locally shared practice that is tangent to different regions in different ways.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 133
页数:16
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach [J].
Acs, Zoltan J. ;
Stam, Erik ;
Audretsch, David B. ;
O'Connor, Allan .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2017, 49 (01) :1-10
[2]   A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda [J].
Alvedalen, Janna ;
Boschma, Ron .
EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2017, 25 (06) :887-903
[3]  
Amin A., 2004, ARCHITECTURES KNOWLE
[4]   Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice [J].
Amin, Ash ;
Roberts, Joanne .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (02) :353-369
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Innovation Policy and the Economy
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2005, EXPERTENINTERVIEW TH
[8]  
Audretsch DB, 2016, J TECHNOL TRANSFER, V41, P1, DOI [10.1007/s10961-014-9381-8, 10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8]
[9]   Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems [J].
Autio, Erkko ;
Nambisan, Satish ;
Thomas, Llewellyn D. W. ;
Wright, Mike .
STRATEGIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (01) :72-95
[10]  
Bathelt H, 2014, J ECON GEOGR, V14, P1