Agreement of bioelectrical resistance, reactance, and phase angle values from supine and standing bioimpedance analyzers

被引:34
作者
Dellinger, Jacob R. [1 ]
Johnson, Baylor A. [1 ]
Benavides, Marqui L. [1 ]
Moore, M. Lane [1 ,2 ]
Stratton, Matthew T. [1 ]
Harty, Patrick S. [1 ]
Siedler, Madelin R. [1 ]
Tinsley, Grant M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Kinesiol & Sport Management, Energy Balance & Body Composit Lab, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Alix Sch Med, Scottsdale, AZ USA
关键词
bioelectrical impedance analysis; bioimpedance spectroscopy; phase angle; impedance; body composition; POPULATION REFERENCE VALUES; IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS; BODY; AGE; SEX;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6579/abe6fa
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Objective. Bioimpedance devices are commonly used to assess health parameters and track changes in body composition. However, the cross-sectional agreement between different devices has not been conclusively established. Thus, the objective of this investigation was to examine the agreement between raw bioelectrical variables (resistance, reactance, and phase angle at the 50 kHz frequency) obtained from three bioimpedance analyzers. Approach. Healthy male (n = 76, mean SD; 33.8 14.5 years; 83.9 15.1 kg; 179.4 6.9 cm) and female (n = 103, mean SD; 33.4 15.9 years; 65.6 12.1 kg; 164.9 6.4 cm) participants completed assessments using three bioimpedance devices: supine bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS), supine single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (SFBIA), and standing multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MFBIA). Differences in raw bioelectrical variables between the devices were quantified via one-way analysis of variance for the total sample and for each sex. Equivalence testing was used to determine equivalence between methods. Main results. Significant differences in all bioelectrical variables were observed between the three devices when examining the total sample and males only. The devices appeared to exhibit slightly better agreement when analyzing female participants only. Equivalence testing using the total sample as well as males and females separately revealed that resistance and phase angle were equivalent between the supine devices (BIS, SFBIA), but not with the standing analyzer (MFBIA). Significance. The present study demonstrated disagreement between different bioimpedance analyzers for quantifying raw bioelectrical variables, with the poorest agreement between devices that employed different body positions during testing. These results suggest that researchers and clinicians should employ device-specific reference values to classify participants based on raw bioelectrical variables, such as phase angle. If reference values are needed but are unavailable for a particular bioimpedance analyzer, the set of reference values produced using the most similar analyzer and reference population should be selected.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [11] Equivalence Tests: A Practical Primer for t Tests, Correlations, and Meta-Analyses
    Lakens, Daniel
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2017, 8 (04) : 355 - 362
  • [12] Lenth R., 2019, EMMEANS ESTIMATED MA
  • [13] Evolution of bioimpedance: a circuitous journey from estimation of physiological function to assessment of body composition and a return to clinical research
    Lukaski, H. C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2013, 67 : S2 - S9
  • [14] Reference values for the phase angle of the electrical bioimpedance: Systematic review and meta-analysis involving more than 250,000 subjects
    Mattiello, Rita
    Amaral, Mariana Azambuja
    Mundstock, Eduardo
    Ziegelmann, Patricia Klarmann
    [J]. CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2020, 39 (05) : 1411 - 1417
  • [15] REDISTRIBUTION OF BODY-FLUIDS DURING POSTURAL MANIPULATIONS
    MAW, GJ
    MACKENZIE, IL
    TAYLOR, NAS
    [J]. ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 155 (02): : 157 - 163
  • [16] Peine S., 2013, Int. J. Body Compos. Res, V11, P67
  • [17] Ordered quantile normalization: a semiparametric transformation built for the cross-validation era
    Peterson, Ryan A.
    Cavanaugh, Joseph E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2020, 47 (13-15) : 2312 - 2327
  • [18] Impedance vector distribution by sex, race, body mass index, and age in the United States: Standard reference intervals as bivariate Z scores
    Piccoli, A
    Pillon, L
    Dumler, F
    [J]. NUTRITION, 2002, 18 (02) : 153 - 167
  • [19] Pournelle G. H., 1953, Journal of Mammalogy, V34, P133, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1421:SDEOLC]2.0.CO
  • [20] 2