Agreement of bioelectrical resistance, reactance, and phase angle values from supine and standing bioimpedance analyzers

被引:34
作者
Dellinger, Jacob R. [1 ]
Johnson, Baylor A. [1 ]
Benavides, Marqui L. [1 ]
Moore, M. Lane [1 ,2 ]
Stratton, Matthew T. [1 ]
Harty, Patrick S. [1 ]
Siedler, Madelin R. [1 ]
Tinsley, Grant M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Kinesiol & Sport Management, Energy Balance & Body Composit Lab, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Alix Sch Med, Scottsdale, AZ USA
关键词
bioelectrical impedance analysis; bioimpedance spectroscopy; phase angle; impedance; body composition; POPULATION REFERENCE VALUES; IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS; BODY; AGE; SEX;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6579/abe6fa
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Objective. Bioimpedance devices are commonly used to assess health parameters and track changes in body composition. However, the cross-sectional agreement between different devices has not been conclusively established. Thus, the objective of this investigation was to examine the agreement between raw bioelectrical variables (resistance, reactance, and phase angle at the 50 kHz frequency) obtained from three bioimpedance analyzers. Approach. Healthy male (n = 76, mean SD; 33.8 14.5 years; 83.9 15.1 kg; 179.4 6.9 cm) and female (n = 103, mean SD; 33.4 15.9 years; 65.6 12.1 kg; 164.9 6.4 cm) participants completed assessments using three bioimpedance devices: supine bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS), supine single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (SFBIA), and standing multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MFBIA). Differences in raw bioelectrical variables between the devices were quantified via one-way analysis of variance for the total sample and for each sex. Equivalence testing was used to determine equivalence between methods. Main results. Significant differences in all bioelectrical variables were observed between the three devices when examining the total sample and males only. The devices appeared to exhibit slightly better agreement when analyzing female participants only. Equivalence testing using the total sample as well as males and females separately revealed that resistance and phase angle were equivalent between the supine devices (BIS, SFBIA), but not with the standing analyzer (MFBIA). Significance. The present study demonstrated disagreement between different bioimpedance analyzers for quantifying raw bioelectrical variables, with the poorest agreement between devices that employed different body positions during testing. These results suggest that researchers and clinicians should employ device-specific reference values to classify participants based on raw bioelectrical variables, such as phase angle. If reference values are needed but are unavailable for a particular bioimpedance analyzer, the set of reference values produced using the most similar analyzer and reference population should be selected.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Bioelectrical impedance analysis: population reference values for phase angle by age and sex
    Barbosa-Silva, MCG
    Barros, AJ
    Wang, J
    Heymsfield, SB
    Pierson, RN
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2005, 82 (01) : 49 - 52
  • [2] Phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis:: Population reference values by age, sex, and body mass index
    Bosy-Westphal, Anja
    Danielzik, Sandra
    Doerhoefer, Ralf-Peter
    Later, Wiebke
    Wiese, Sonja
    Mueller, Manfred J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2006, 30 (04) : 309 - 316
  • [3] A Primer on the Use of Equivalence Testing for Evaluating Measurement Agreement
    Dixon, Philip M.
    Saint-Maurice, Pedro F.
    Kim, Youngwon
    Hibbing, Paul
    Bai, Yang
    Welk, Gregory J.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2018, 50 (04) : 837 - 845
  • [4] Phase angle and mortality: a systematic review
    Garlini, Luiza M.
    Alves, Fernanda D.
    Ceretta, Luciane B.
    Perry, Ingrid S.
    Souza, Gabriela C.
    Clausell, Nadine O.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2019, 73 (04) : 495 - 508
  • [5] Association of mortality and phase angle measured by different bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) devices
    Genton, Laurence
    Herrmann, Francois. R.
    Spoerri, Adrian
    Graf, Christophe E.
    [J]. CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2018, 37 (03) : 1066 - 1069
  • [6] Time course of supine and standing shifts in total body, intracellular and extracellular water for a sample of healthy adults
    Gibson, A. L.
    Beam, J. R.
    Alencar, M. K.
    Zuhl, M. N.
    Mermier, C. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2015, 69 (01) : 14 - 19
  • [7] Phase angle and its determinants in healthy subjects: influence of body composition
    Gonzalez, Maria Cristina
    Barbosa-Silva, Thiago G.
    Bielemann, Renata M.
    Gallagher, Dympna
    Heymsfield, Steven B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2016, 103 (03) : 712 - 716
  • [8] Ethnic differences in fat and muscle mass and their implication for interpretation of bioelectrical impedance vector analysis
    Jensen, Bjoern
    Moritoyo, Takashi
    Kaufer-Horwitz, Martha
    Peine, Sven
    Norman, Kristina
    Maisch, Michael J.
    Matsumoto, Aya
    Masui, Yuka
    Velazquez-Gonzalez, Antonio
    Dominguez-Garcia, Jannet
    Fonz-Enriquez, Elizabeth
    Salgado-Moctezuma, Saori G.
    Bosy-Westphal, Anja
    [J]. APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2019, 44 (06) : 619 - 626
  • [9] Kassambara A., 2020, **DATA OBJECT**
  • [10] Bioelectrical impedance analysis principles and methods
    Kyle, UG
    Bosaeus, I
    De Lorenzo, AD
    Deurenberg, P
    Elia, M
    Gómez, JM
    Heitmann, BL
    Kent-Smith, L
    Melchior, JC
    Pirlich, M
    Scharfetter, H
    Schols, AMWJ
    Pichard, C
    [J]. CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2004, 23 (05) : 1226 - 1243