Genomic Research and American Indian Tribal Communities in Oklahoma: Learning From Past Research Misconduct and Building Future Trusting Partnerships

被引:10
作者
Chadwick, Jennifer Q. [1 ]
Copeland, Kenneth C. [1 ]
Branam, Dannielle E. [2 ]
Erb-Alvarez, Julie A. [3 ]
Khan, Sohail I. [4 ]
Peercy, Michael T. [5 ]
Rogers, Mark E. [6 ]
Saunkeah, Bobby R. [5 ]
Tryggestad, Jeanie B. [1 ]
Wharton, David F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pediat, Sect Diabet & Endocrinol, Oklahoma City, OK 73190 USA
[2] Choctaw Nation Oklahoma, Heath Serv Author, Durant, OK USA
[3] Indian Hlth Serv, Oklahoma City Area, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[4] Cherokee Nat, Dept Hlth Res, Tahlequah, OK USA
[5] Chickasaw Nation, Div Res & Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth, Ada, OK USA
[6] Absentee Shawnee Tribe, Tribal Hlth Syst, Shawnee, OK USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
American Indian research; American Indians; collaborative research; genomic research; ADOLESCENTS;
D O I
10.1093/aje/kwz062
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Research misconduct and consequential harms have been inflicted upon American Indian/Alaska Native communities for decades. To protect their people and culture and to retain oversight over research, many Native communities have established tribal health research and institutional review boards. The Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) Study showcases a successful, trusting research collaboration with tribal nations and academic investigators in Oklahoma. In 2006, the TODAY Study investigators proposed a modification of the study protocol to collect biological specimens from participants for genomic analyses and indefinite storage. Partnering American Indian tribal nations elected not to participate in the genomics collection and repository proposal. Reasons included 1) protection of cultural values, 2) concerns regarding community anonymity, 3) a potential threat to tribal services eligibility, 4) broad informed consent language, and 5) vague definitions of data access and usage. The nations believed the proposed genomics analyses presented a risk of harm to their people and nations without clear benefit. Since the 2006 proposal and the advancement of genomics research, many tribal communities in Oklahoma, appreciating the potential benefits of genomic research, are developing policies regarding oversight of/access to data and biological specimens to mitigate risks and provide members and communities with opportunities to participate in safe and meaningful genomic research.
引用
收藏
页码:1206 / 1212
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Offspring sex impacts DNA methylation and gene expression in placentae from women with diabetes during pregnancy
    Alexander, Jacqueline
    Teague, April M.
    Chen, Jing
    Aston, Christopher E.
    Leung, Yuet-Kin
    Chernausek, Steven
    Simmons, Rebecca A.
    Pinney, Sara E.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (02):
  • [2] American Indian Law Center Inc, 1999, MOD TRIB RES COD MAT, P2
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1995, CONTROLLING HUMAN HE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2015, The Federal Register, V80, P37862
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1979, The Belmont Report: Ethical Principle and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Research Subjects
  • [6] Barnes P.M., 2010, National Center for Health Statistics, V20
  • [7] Berg K, 2005, AM J HUM GENET, V77, P519
  • [8] Ethical, Legal, Social, and Policy Implications of Behavioral Genetics
    Berryessa, Colleen M.
    Cho, Mildred K.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENOMICS AND HUMAN GENETICS, VOL 14, 2013, 14 : 515 - 534
  • [9] Blanchard A, 2018, RES CAREERS, P23
  • [10] Blanchard JW, 2018, NAT C AM IND POL RES